From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20754 invoked by alias); 8 Dec 2009 19:56:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 20743 invoked by uid 22791); 8 Dec 2009 19:56:00 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from smtp-outbound-1.vmware.com (HELO smtp-outbound-1.vmware.com) (65.115.85.69) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Dec 2009 19:55:56 +0000 Received: from jupiter.vmware.com (mailhost5.vmware.com [10.16.68.131]) by smtp-outbound-1.vmware.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E846B13CF5; Tue, 8 Dec 2009 11:55:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.20.94.141] (msnyder-server.eng.vmware.com [10.20.94.141]) by jupiter.vmware.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCCD3DC055; Tue, 8 Dec 2009 11:55:54 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4B1EAF26.7060200@vmware.com> Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2009 19:56:00 -0000 From: Michael Snyder User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (X11/20090624) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Hui Zhu CC: Joel Brobecker , gdb-patches ml , Mark Kettenis Subject: Re: [RFA] Prec x86 MMX 3DNow! SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE4 support References: <4B1D3829.2020509@vmware.com> <20091207174317.GF2891@adacore.com> <4B1D4152.7000200@vmware.com> <20091207180036.GG2891@adacore.com> <4B1D43E1.5010400@vmware.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-12/txt/msg00122.txt.bz2 Hui Zhu wrote: > I think your mean is case 5...10:, right? > > I did it before, a lot of people told me that they didn't like it. So... OK, please ignore that issue. > And about: > + /* 3DNow! prefetch */ > + case 0x0f0d: > > This is really a big change. And In i386-tdep.c, there are a lot of > code is like it too. > So I suggest we make a special patch to fix all of this code after a > clear and deeply discussion. :) What do you think about it? Fair enough.