From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18664 invoked by alias); 20 Nov 2009 17:26:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 18652 invoked by uid 22791); 20 Nov 2009 17:26:24 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_40 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from smtp-outbound-2.vmware.com (HELO smtp-outbound-2.vmware.com) (65.115.85.73) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 Nov 2009 17:25:21 +0000 Received: from jupiter.vmware.com (mailhost5.vmware.com [10.16.68.131]) by smtp-outbound-2.vmware.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 107E42804D; Fri, 20 Nov 2009 09:25:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.20.94.141] (msnyder-server.eng.vmware.com [10.20.94.141]) by jupiter.vmware.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06E47DC07E; Fri, 20 Nov 2009 09:25:20 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4B06D040.3080402@vmware.com> Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 17:26:00 -0000 From: Michael Snyder User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (X11/20090624) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Eli Zaretskii CC: "tromey@redhat.com" , "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" , "glaw@undo-software.com" , "jakob@virtutech.com" , "teawater@gmail.com" Subject: Re: [RFA] replay bookmarks References: <4AEDF9F4.9040207@vmware.com> <834opec530.fsf@gnu.org> <4AEE27E9.1070005@vmware.com> <4AF9E44B.90003@vmware.com> <83tyx1og0c.fsf@gnu.org> <4AFB0307.7000302@vmware.com> <83ocn8oqf2.fsf@gnu.org> In-Reply-To: <83ocn8oqf2.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-11/txt/msg00440.txt.bz2 Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 10:31:35 -0800 >> From: Michael Snyder >> CC: "tromey@redhat.com" , >> "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" , >> "glaw@undo-software.com" , >> "jakob@virtutech.com" , >> "teawater@gmail.com" >> >>>> +goto-bookmark [] >>>> + Return the replay target to the excution position represented by the >>>> + Nth bookmark. Resume replay debugging from that point. >>> Is the argument really optional here? >> No. Sorry. How about this? > > This is good, thanks. > OK -- since the only remaining questions pertain to the remote implimentation, and since the VirtuTech people are looking into that, I've gone ahead and committed the remainder of the patch, omitting the remote part. We can add the remote part back in when we converge on it. Michael