From: Keith Seitz <keiths@redhat.com>
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [RFA] Typedef support for linespecs
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 23:35:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4AFB4A4F.8010604@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091111230149.GA28314@caradoc.them.org>
On 11/11/2009 03:01 PM, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> OK. I still hate linespecs, though.
Committed. Thank you for your review.
> (Seriously... if we figure out that it isn't a file:line, we should
> use the normal expression parser for an expression portion of
> it... yes, I do realize just how difficult this would be, but the
> inconsistencies drive folks mad.)
Yeah, I rather agree with you. Something like this may yet get onto an
Archer agenda in the future, but for now, there are, unfortunately,
"bigger fish to fry" -- at least for me.
Thanks,
Keith
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-11 23:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-11 22:49 Keith Seitz
2009-11-11 23:02 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2009-11-11 23:35 ` Keith Seitz [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4AFB4A4F.8010604@redhat.com \
--to=keiths@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox