From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-68170-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 10399 invoked by alias); 4 Nov 2009 08:26:54 -0000
Received: (qmail 10390 invoked by uid 22791); 4 Nov 2009 08:26:53 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail.codesourcery.com (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (38.113.113.100)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 Nov 2009 08:26:49 +0000
Received: (qmail 8994 invoked from network); 4 Nov 2009 08:26:47 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO ?172.16.1.24?) (maxim@127.0.0.2)   by mail.codesourcery.com with ESMTPA; 4 Nov 2009 08:26:47 -0000
Message-ID: <4AF13ABF.7030407@codesourcery.com>
Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2009 08:26:00 -0000
From: Maxim Kuvyrkov <maxim@codesourcery.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Macintosh/20090812)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Maxim Kuvyrkov <maxim@codesourcery.com>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org,   Andreas Schwab <schwab@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH, M68K] Handle TLS
References: <4AF05659.1070404@codesourcery.com> <20091103230812.GA8761@caradoc.them.org>
In-Reply-To: <20091103230812.GA8761@caradoc.them.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2009-11/txt/msg00077.txt.bz2

Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 03, 2009 at 07:12:09PM +0300, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> The following simple patch adds handling of TLS to m68k gdbserver.
>>
>> A corresponding kernel patch is being reviewed here
>> <http://marc.info/?l=linux-m68k&m=125447760017098&w=2>.
>>
>> Tested on coldfire-linux.
>>
>> OK to apply?
> 
> This is fine with two caveats:
> 
> * I think it would be best to not apply it until you have an ack for
> the kernel patch defining PTRACE_GET_THREAD_AREA.

OK, that may take a while though.
> 
> * Provide a fallback definition for PTRACE_GET_THREAD_AREA.  I assume
> existing m68k kernel headers do not define it, so the build would
> fail.

OK.

Thanks for the review!

-- 
Maxim Kuvyrkov
CodeSourcery
maxim@codesourcery.com
(650) 331-3385 x724