Hui Zhu wrote:
> Thanks Michael.
> 
> With change:
>  static struct target_ops record_ops;
> @@ -338,7 +344,10 @@ record_list_release_following (struct re
>      {
>        rec = tmp->next;
>        if (record_entry_release (tmp) == record_end)
> +	{
>  	record_insn_num--;
> +	  record_insn_count--;
> +	}
>        tmp = rec;
>      }
>  }
> @@ -367,7 +376,6 @@ record_list_release_first (void)
>        /* tmp is now isolated, and can be deleted.  */
>        if (record_entry_release (tmp) == record_end)
>  	{
> -	  record_insn_num--;
>  	  break;	/* End loop at first record_end.  */
>  	}
> To:
>  static struct target_ops record_ops;
> @@ -338,7 +344,10 @@ record_list_release_following (struct re
>      {
>        rec = tmp->next;
>        if (record_entry_release (tmp) == record_end)
> +	{
>  	  record_insn_num--;
> +	  record_insn_count--;
> +	}
>        tmp = rec;
>      }
>  }
> @@ -367,7 +376,6 @@ record_list_release_first (void)
>        /* tmp is now isolated, and can be deleted.  */
>        if (record_entry_release (tmp) == record_end)
> - 	{
> -	  record_insn_num--;
>  	  break;	/* End loop at first record_end.  */
> - 	}
> 
> Just some format change.
> 
> I am OK with this patch.

Thanks, changes attached and committed.