From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13816 invoked by alias); 16 Sep 2009 20:27:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 13808 invoked by uid 22791); 16 Sep 2009 20:27:45 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 20:27:41 +0000 Received: from int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.16]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n8GKReIG011967 for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 16:27:40 -0400 Received: from [IPv6:::1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n8GKRb59010137 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 16:27:39 -0400 Message-ID: <4AB14A38.6000903@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 20:27:00 -0000 From: Keith Seitz User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.1) Gecko/20090814 Fedora/3.0-2.6.b3.fc11 Lightning/1.0pre Thunderbird/3.0b3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFA] dwarf2_physname References: <4A9C54F6.1000909@eagercon.com> <4A9C5A66.7060609@redhat.com> <20090901221122.GA24658@caradoc.them.org> <4A9DADB6.2090508@redhat.com> <20090901234212.GB32355@caradoc.them.org> <4AAE8DDB.3060005@redhat.com> <20090914224754.GA7012@caradoc.them.org> <4AAED830.5080909@redhat.com> <20090915133207.GA17606@caradoc.them.org> <4AAFB868.9050407@redhat.com> <20090915161158.GA31410@caradoc.them.org> In-Reply-To: <20090915161158.GA31410@caradoc.them.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-09/txt/msg00528.txt.bz2 On 09/15/2009 09:11 AM, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > So, if icc is failing to mark things artificial, does it make up for > it by having DW_AT_object_pointer? I don't believe GCC generates that > attribtue (guess it should!). Unfortunately, ICC does not emit DW_AT_object_pointer. It outputs only what I've previously posted. > This is an area where, pain or not, I'd really prefer to have only one > way to do things. I can certainly understand that (and I agree): I was just throwing that out as an option. Afterall, there is a bigger picture (for you) to consider -- I'm just a linux-centered, who-cares-about-anything-else hacker. O:-) > I looked over your patch again. I have no objection and Tom's already > approved it upthread; I think you're good to go. Tom has suggested to me to conform and start posting bigger bits of the patches. Unless I hear anything to the contrary, I'll consider this a general approval of the approach, and I will attempt to submit any outstanding isolated patches before posting the whole (ginormous) patch which implements everything. I've also added a page to the wiki about running the test suite on non-gcc compilers (specifically ICC and RealView). It's not complete in the sense that I think some careful Dejagnu configury and/or compiler wrapper trickery might produce better (or more meaningful) results, but it's a start. For example, I completely ignore the whole multilib issue. In my case, I was really just interested in the C++ DWARF implementations of these compilers, and I believe the setup is sufficient for this purpose. In a real world scenario, it probably isn't. I hope that people who remember/know more about this stuff add their two bits to the page. Keith