Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Snyder <msnyder@vmware.com>
To: Marc Khouzam <marc.khouzam@ericsson.com>
Cc: 'Doug Evans' <dje@google.com>,
	  "'gdb-patches@sourceware.org'" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>,
	 'Greg Law' <glaw@undo-software.com>,
	  'Pedro Alves' <pedro@codesourcery.com>,
	 'Hui Zhu' <teawater@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] only update dcache after write succeeds
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 20:21:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4AAEA5DE.10009@vmware.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <F7CE05678329534C957159168FA70DEC515363D1E3@EUSAACMS0703.eamcs.ericsson.se>

Marc Khouzam wrote:
>  
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Michael Snyder [mailto:msnyder@vmware.com] 
>> Sent: Monday, September 14, 2009 3:27 PM
>> To: Doug Evans
>> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Marc Khouzam; Greg Law; Pedro 
>> Alves; Hui Zhu
>> Subject: Re: [patch] only update dcache after write succeeds
>>
>> Doug Evans wrote:
>>> Hi.
>>>
>>> Marc, Greg: Can you see if this patch fixes things for you?
>> Hey Doug,
>>
>> I tested this change, and it does indeed seem to fix the problem
>> with target record -- but.   ;-)
>>
>> Part of the reason that it works is that record_xfer_partial
>> calls error() instead of returning -1.  If I change it so that
>> it returns -1, things get more complicated.
> 
> Just a note that PRecord used to return -1 which caused memory
> to be changed even when the query was answered with 'n'.
> That is why Hui changed it to error()

OK -- and now I see why it used to change the memory anyway.
The caller (memory_xfer_partial) would call the target beneath.

Makes me suspect that Doug's change is OK in general.


  reply	other threads:[~2009-09-14 20:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-09-14 19:17 Doug Evans
2009-09-14 19:26 ` Greg Law
2009-09-14 19:28   ` Marc Khouzam
2009-09-14 19:26 ` Michael Snyder
2009-09-14 19:29   ` Marc Khouzam
2009-09-14 20:21     ` Michael Snyder [this message]
2009-09-14 19:43   ` Doug Evans
2009-09-14 20:20     ` Michael Snyder
2009-09-14 20:40       ` Pedro Alves
2009-09-14 20:43         ` Michael Snyder
2009-09-14 20:41       ` Doug Evans
2009-09-14 20:45         ` Michael Snyder
2009-09-15  0:11 ` Hui Zhu
2009-09-15  6:58 ` Doug Evans

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4AAEA5DE.10009@vmware.com \
    --to=msnyder@vmware.com \
    --cc=dje@google.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=glaw@undo-software.com \
    --cc=marc.khouzam@ericsson.com \
    --cc=pedro@codesourcery.com \
    --cc=teawater@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox