From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15126 invoked by alias); 8 Sep 2009 22:51:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 15066 invoked by uid 22791); 8 Sep 2009 22:51:29 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from smtp-outbound-1.vmware.com (HELO smtp-outbound-1.vmware.com) (65.115.85.69) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Sep 2009 22:51:21 +0000 Received: from mailhost4.vmware.com (mailhost4.vmware.com [10.16.67.124]) by smtp-outbound-1.vmware.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9BC518004; Tue, 8 Sep 2009 15:51:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.20.94.141] (msnyder-server.eng.vmware.com [10.20.94.141]) by mailhost4.vmware.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D553C9B8A; Tue, 8 Sep 2009 15:51:19 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4AA6DF8B.8040208@vmware.com> Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2009 22:51:00 -0000 From: Michael Snyder User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (X11/20080411) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Joel Brobecker CC: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" , Hui Zhu , Mark Kettenis Subject: Re: [RFA] cleanup of syscall consts in process record References: <4AA2D95B.4090904@vmware.com> <20090908164934.GP30677@adacore.com> <4AA696F6.6040503@vmware.com> <4AA69878.9060602@vmware.com> <20090908180402.GR30677@adacore.com> <4AA6AB33.20304@vmware.com> <20090908200802.GT30677@adacore.com> In-Reply-To: <20090908200802.GT30677@adacore.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-09/txt/msg00228.txt.bz2 Joel Brobecker wrote: >> So this is approved, then? > > Yep, especially since Mark is fine with the patch as well. Thank you, all -- committed!