From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23303 invoked by alias); 27 Aug 2009 00:05:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 23293 invoked by uid 22791); 27 Aug 2009 00:05:43 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from smtp-outbound-2.vmware.com (HELO smtp-outbound-2.vmware.com) (65.115.85.73) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 27 Aug 2009 00:05:38 +0000 Received: from mailhost2.vmware.com (mailhost2.vmware.com [10.16.67.167]) by smtp-outbound-2.vmware.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4A1DB015; Wed, 26 Aug 2009 17:05:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.20.94.141] (msnyder-server.eng.vmware.com [10.20.94.141]) by mailhost2.vmware.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4CF68E55D; Wed, 26 Aug 2009 17:05:34 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4A95CE00.9040204@vmware.com> Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 00:28:00 -0000 From: Michael Snyder User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (X11/20080411) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Hui Zhu CC: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" Subject: Re: [RFA] change to i386_process_record, with test References: <4A90AFCD.9020603@vmware.com> <4A90C0E7.7060607@vmware.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-08/txt/msg00464.txt.bz2 Hui Zhu wrote: > On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 12:09, Michael Snyder wrote: >> Hui Zhu wrote: >>> On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 10:56, Michael Snyder wrote: >>>> Hi Hui, >>>> >>>> Would you please try this test on a 32 bit intel target? >>>> I think it demonstrates the need for the attached change. >>>> This also fixes four fails in machinestate.exp. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Michael >>>> >>> Cool. Thanks for find this big bug out. :) >>> >>> BTW, I think I cannot reproduce this issue is because we use different >>> gcc. >> Yeah, I think you're right. >> So you approve the change and the tests? Shall I commit? > > Of course. :) Committed. Thanks.