From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30650 invoked by alias); 18 Aug 2009 19:21:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 30615 invoked by uid 22791); 18 Aug 2009 19:21:01 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-ew0-f224.google.com (HELO mail-ew0-f224.google.com) (209.85.219.224) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 18 Aug 2009 19:20:54 +0000 Received: by ewy24 with SMTP id 24so4136358ewy.23 for ; Tue, 18 Aug 2009 12:20:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.210.62.4 with SMTP id k4mr5002518eba.84.1250623251035; Tue, 18 Aug 2009 12:20:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from yakj.usersys.redhat.com (nat-pool-str.redhat.com [66.187.229.200]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 24sm816746eyx.43.2009.08.18.12.20.47 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 18 Aug 2009 12:20:48 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4A8AFF0E.3010505@gnu.org> Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 19:57:00 -0000 From: Paolo Bonzini User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.1) Gecko/20090814 Fedora/3.0-2.6.b3.fc11 Lightning/1.0pre Thunderbird/3.0b3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ralf Wildenhues , "Joseph S. Myers" , Dave Korn , binutils@sourceware.org, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/N] The big bump References: <4A86E723.3000602@gmail.com> <20090818191404.GB30961@gmx.de> In-Reply-To: <20090818191404.GB30961@gmx.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-08/txt/msg00291.txt.bz2 On 08/18/2009 09:14 PM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > May I proceed in updating the tree to 2.64/1.11 before getting the rest > of the tree (that already has out-of-sync autotools) back into sync? As far as I'm concerned, yes. Nothing outside binutils/gdb/gcc has ever cared much about Autotools versions (and some parts like newlib/libgloss and winsup are not even CCed), it should be fine as long as we provide override.m4 to cover their bugs. Paolo