From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10940 invoked by alias); 3 Aug 2009 17:31:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 10919 invoked by uid 22791); 3 Aug 2009 17:31:04 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from smtp-outbound-1.vmware.com (HELO smtp-outbound-1.vmware.com) (65.115.85.69) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 03 Aug 2009 17:30:58 +0000 Received: from mailhost4.vmware.com (mailhost4.vmware.com [10.16.67.124]) by smtp-outbound-1.vmware.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82AFD13461; Mon, 3 Aug 2009 10:30:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.20.94.141] (msnyder-server.eng.vmware.com [10.20.94.141]) by mailhost4.vmware.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 795F1C9A35; Mon, 3 Aug 2009 10:30:53 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4A771EA8.80002@vmware.com> Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2009 17:31:00 -0000 From: Michael Snyder User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (X11/20080411) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Hui Zhu CC: gdb-patches ml Subject: Re: [PREC/RFA] Add not_replay to make precord support release memory better References: <4A69182D.9090004@vmware.com> <4A6B6E02.5080702@vmware.com> <4A74C90D.4040004@vmware.com> <4A766F30.2030000@vmware.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-08/txt/msg00029.txt.bz2 Hui Zhu wrote: > The record_exec_entry don't have big contact with core dump patch. > > I think the new version is more clear. But we had this patch all worked out, and now you've added a bunch of new stuff to it. It's not a "new version" of the "add not_replay" patch, it's a whole new change. That's not the way we do it. If you want to add new stuff, you start a new thread, you don't add it into a thread that's already in review.