Pedro Alves wrote:
> On Friday 31 July 2009 21:31:13, Michael Snyder wrote:
>> drow@false.org wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 04:59:36PM -0700, Michael Snyder wrote:
>>>> @@ -5189,7 +5192,10 @@ store_registers_using_G (const struct re
>>>>    /* remote_prepare_to_store insures that rsa->sizeof_g_packet gets
>>>>       updated.  */
>>>>    bin2hex (regs, p, rsa->sizeof_g_packet);
>>>> -  remote_send (&rs->buf, &rs->buf_size);
>>>> +  putpkt (rs->buf);
>>>> +  getpkt (&rs->buf, &rs->buf_size, 0);
>>>> +  if (rs->buf[0] == 'E')
>>>> +    error (_("Could not write registers"));
> 
> Can you still include the remote error string in this message?
> Otherwise, this loses the "feature" of being able to send
> more verbose error down the pipe.  

Darn, crossed messages.

How's this, Pedro?