From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2385 invoked by alias); 18 Nov 2002 20:57:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 2318 invoked from network); 18 Nov 2002 20:57:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (63.119.183.65) by sources.redhat.com with QMTP; 18 Nov 2002 20:57:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 27318 invoked from network); 18 Nov 2002 20:53:32 -0000 Received: from cpe-24-221-209-215.co.sprintbbd.net (HELO localhost) (24.221.209.215) by external1 with SMTP; 18 Nov 2002 20:53:32 -0000 Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 12:57:00 -0000 Subject: Re: Ping on Objc patches Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v482) Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com To: Michael Snyder From: Adam Fedor In-Reply-To: <3DD93840.20EFF844@redhat.com> Message-Id: <4A6C029C-FB38-11D6-A5B4-000A277AC1A4@doc.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-11/txt/msg00469.txt.bz2 On Monday, November 18, 2002, at 11:58 AM, Michael Snyder wrote: > > What was the outcome of the discussion about this? > Weren't we going to wait until most or all of the rest of the > objc changes were in? > > Two things: One is that it's hard to see if changes to the ObjC files are working if you can't compile them. Second is, some people expressed reservations about combining c-exp.y and objc-exp.y, so I'd like to at least get something working (eventually) until we are done arguing about that.