Re: [RFA] epilogue unwinder for i386 (reverse 1/2)

Daniel Jacobowitz
2009-07-05T18:49:01Z

On Sun, Jul 05, 2009 at 02:35:43PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> I also think you should add a comment about the specific ordering of
> this unwinder. It has to come before the dwarf2 unwinder because GCC
> doesn't provide proper CFI for the epilogue, right?

Right - I would like to have a way to suppress this unwinder, maybe
based on the producer string like other recognized dwarf2-frame
quirks, but we can worry about that later. I hope it will be
unnecessary with GCC 4.5.

--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery