From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18093 invoked by alias); 30 Jun 2009 18:52:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 18083 invoked by uid 22791); 30 Jun 2009 18:52:45 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from smtp-outbound-1.vmware.com (HELO smtp-outbound-1.vmware.com) (65.115.85.69) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 18:52:40 +0000 Received: from jupiter.vmware.com (mailhost5.vmware.com [10.16.68.131]) by smtp-outbound-1.vmware.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9E2B13407; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 11:52:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.20.94.141] (msnyder-server.eng.vmware.com [10.20.94.141]) by jupiter.vmware.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E05F1DC5FF; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 11:52:35 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4A4A5E71.1070104@vmware.com> Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 18:52:00 -0000 From: Michael Snyder User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (X11/20080411) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: paawan oza , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Submition of i386.record.floating.point.patch References: <652690.17819.qm@web112515.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <652690.17819.qm@web112515.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-06/txt/msg00885.txt.bz2 paawan oza wrote: > Hi, > I have been waiting long for the first patch to go. > I have bee trying hard to give explanations and include review comments if any. > I request, please review the patch and provide your acceptance. > It would be nice to see myself contributing in reversible as much as possible. > > the questions asked by Hui, have already been clarified. > please see the below mail. > > Regards, > Oza. Hi Oza, I know you have been waiting a long time, and I appologize. It is unfortunate that some submissions take a long time to review, but you are not being singled out. It took over a year for Teawater's process record patches to get into gdb. I certainly hope that it will take less than that for yours, but please remember that the volunteer maintainers here all have full time jobs with their own priorities and deadlines. We're doing the best we can. Michael