From: Sami Wagiaalla <swagiaal@redhat.com>
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [RFA] Renam sutruct using_direct members
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 16:44:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A4A4005.7030703@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m3fxefwuv4.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
I have expanded this patch to include a general rename of the
variables and arguments of all callers.
2009-06-29 Sami Wagiaalla <swagiaal@redhat.com>
* cp-support.h (struct using_direct): Rename members inner and
outer to import_src, and import_dest respectively.
* cp-namespace.c (cp_add_using_directive): Update.
(cp_add_using): Update.
(cp_copy_usings): Update.
(cp_lookup_symbol_namespace): Update.
(cp_scan_for_anonymous_namespaces): Update.
* cp-support.c (make_symbol_overload_list_using): Update.
* cp-support.h (cp_add_using_directive, cp_add_using): Rename
arguments from inner and outer to src and dest respectively.
* cp-namespace.c (cp_add_using_directive): Ditto.
(cp_add_using): Ditto.
diff --git a/gdb/cp-namespace.c b/gdb/cp-namespace.c
index ef526ca..d2d8f2e 100644
--- a/gdb/cp-namespace.c
+++ b/gdb/cp-namespace.c
@@ -103,23 +103,23 @@ cp_scan_for_anonymous_namespaces (const struct
symbol *symbol)
"(anonymous namespace)",
ANONYMOUS_NAMESPACE_LEN) == 0)
{
- int outer_len = (previous_component == 0 ? 0 :
previous_component - 2);
- int inner_len = next_component;
+ int dest_len = (previous_component == 0 ? 0 : previous_component
- 2);
+ int src_len = next_component;
- char *outer = alloca (outer_len + 1);
- char *inner = alloca (inner_len + 1);
+ char *dest = alloca (dest_len + 1);
+ char *src = alloca (src_len + 1);
- memcpy (outer, name, outer_len);
- memcpy (inner, name, inner_len);
+ memcpy (dest, name, dest_len);
+ memcpy (src, name, src_len);
- outer[outer_len] = '\0';
- inner[inner_len] = '\0';
+ dest[dest_len] = '\0';
+ src[src_len] = '\0';
/* We've found a component of the name that's an
anonymous namespace. So add symbols in it to the
namespace given by the previous component if there is
one, or to the global namespace if there isn't. */
- cp_add_using_directive (outer, inner);
+ cp_add_using_directive (dest, src);
}
/* The "+ 2" is for the "::". */
previous_component = next_component + 2;
@@ -134,7 +134,7 @@ cp_scan_for_anonymous_namespaces (const struct
symbol *symbol)
has already been added, don't add it twice. */
void
-cp_add_using_directive (const char *outer, const char *inner)
+cp_add_using_directive (const char *dest, const char *src)
{
struct using_direct *current;
struct using_direct *new;
@@ -143,12 +143,12 @@ cp_add_using_directive (const char *outer, const
char *inner)
for (current = using_directives; current != NULL; current =
current->next)
{
- if (strcmp (current->inner, inner) == 0
- && strcmp (current->outer, outer) == 0)
+ if (strcmp (current->import_src, src) == 0
+ && strcmp (current->import_dest, dest) == 0)
return;
}
- using_directives = cp_add_using (outer, inner, using_directives);
+ using_directives = cp_add_using (dest, src, using_directives);
}
@@ -200,22 +200,22 @@ cp_is_anonymous (const char *namespace)
!= NULL);
}
-/* Create a new struct using direct whose inner namespace is INNER
- and whose outer namespace is OUTER.
+/* Create a new struct using direct which imports the namespace SRC
+ into the scope DEST.
Set its next member in the linked list to NEXT; allocate all memory
using xmalloc. It copies the strings, so NAME can be a temporary
string. */
struct using_direct *
-cp_add_using (const char *outer,
- const char *inner,
+cp_add_using (const char *dest,
+ const char *src,
struct using_direct *next)
{
struct using_direct *retval;
retval = xmalloc (sizeof (struct using_direct));
- retval->inner = savestring (inner, strlen(inner));
- retval->outer = savestring (outer, strlen(outer));
+ retval->import_src = savestring (src, strlen(src));
+ retval->import_dest = savestring (dest, strlen(dest));
retval->next = next;
return retval;
@@ -237,14 +237,14 @@ cp_copy_usings (struct using_direct *using,
{
struct using_direct *retval
= obstack_alloc (obstack, sizeof (struct using_direct));
- retval->inner = obsavestring (using->inner, strlen (using->inner),
+ retval->import_src = obsavestring (using->import_src, strlen
(using->import_src),
obstack);
- retval->outer = obsavestring (using->outer, strlen (using->outer),
+ retval->import_dest = obsavestring (using->import_dest, strlen
(using->import_dest),
obstack);
retval->next = cp_copy_usings (using->next, obstack);
- xfree (using->inner);
- xfree (using->outer);
+ xfree (using->import_src);
+ xfree (using->import_dest);
xfree (using);
return retval;
@@ -346,9 +346,9 @@ cp_lookup_symbol_namespace (const char *namespace,
current != NULL;
current = current->next)
{
- if (strcmp (namespace, current->outer) == 0)
+ if (strcmp (namespace, current->import_dest) == 0)
{
- sym = cp_lookup_symbol_namespace (current->inner,
+ sym = cp_lookup_symbol_namespace (current->import_src,
name,
linkage_name,
block,
diff --git a/gdb/cp-support.c b/gdb/cp-support.c
index bf42636..f12d785 100644
--- a/gdb/cp-support.c
+++ b/gdb/cp-support.c
@@ -716,10 +716,10 @@ make_symbol_overload_list_using (const char
*func_name,
current != NULL;
current = current->next)
{
- if (strcmp (namespace, current->outer) == 0)
+ if (strcmp (namespace, current->import_dest) == 0)
{
make_symbol_overload_list_using (func_name,
- current->inner);
+ current->import_src);
}
}
diff --git a/gdb/cp-support.h b/gdb/cp-support.h
index ea36608..b5a5c5f 100644
--- a/gdb/cp-support.h
+++ b/gdb/cp-support.h
@@ -37,15 +37,15 @@ struct type;
struct demangle_component;
/* This struct is designed to store data from using directives. It
- says that names from namespace INNER should be visible within
- namespace OUTER. OUTER should always be a strict initial substring
- of INNER. These form a linked list; NEXT is the next element of
- the list. */
+ says that names from namespace IMPORT_SRC should be visible within
+ namespace IMPORT_DEST. IMPORT_DEST should always be a strict initial
+ substring of IMPORT_SRC. These form a linked list; NEXT is the next
element
+ of the list. */
struct using_direct
{
- char *inner;
- char *outer;
+ char *import_src;
+ char *import_dest;
struct using_direct *next;
};
@@ -76,11 +76,11 @@ extern struct type *cp_lookup_rtti_type (const char
*name,
extern int cp_is_anonymous (const char *namespace);
-extern void cp_add_using_directive (const char *outer,
- const char *inner);
+extern void cp_add_using_directive (const char *dest,
+ const char *src);
-extern struct using_direct *cp_add_using (const char *outer,
- const char *inner,
+extern struct using_direct *cp_add_using (const char *dest,
+ const char *src,
struct using_direct *next);
extern void cp_initialize_namespace (void);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-30 16:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-25 18:39 Sami Wagiaalla
2009-06-04 21:30 ` Tom Tromey
2009-06-30 16:44 ` Sami Wagiaalla [this message]
2009-06-30 21:25 ` Tom Tromey
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A4A4005.7030703@redhat.com \
--to=swagiaal@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox