From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27438 invoked by alias); 22 Jun 2009 20:48:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 27429 invoked by uid 22791); 22 Jun 2009 20:48:59 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from smtp-outbound-2.vmware.com (HELO smtp-outbound-2.vmware.com) (65.115.85.73) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 22 Jun 2009 20:48:51 +0000 Received: from mailhost2.vmware.com (mailhost2.vmware.com [10.16.67.167]) by smtp-outbound-2.vmware.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E9AF600A; Mon, 22 Jun 2009 13:48:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.20.94.141] (msnyder-server.eng.vmware.com [10.20.94.141]) by mailhost2.vmware.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EAC38E84D; Mon, 22 Jun 2009 13:48:49 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4A3FEE05.8060904@vmware.com> Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 20:48:00 -0000 From: Michael Snyder User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (X11/20080411) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Doug Evans CC: Paul Pluzhnikov , Ulrich Weigand , Joel Brobecker , "tromey@redhat.com" , "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" Subject: Re: [rfc][patch] Eliminate quadratic slow-down on number of solibs. References: <8ac60eac0905121420t3954685v4b5328d05e072f92@mail.gmail.com> <200906221709.n5MH9xPY029467@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> <8ac60eac0906221156o91c8059t17d1dd1bd2752dd0@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-06/txt/msg00587.txt.bz2 Doug Evans wrote: > On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 11:56 AM, Paul Pluzhnikov wrote: >> Unfortunately I don't have any targets that support overlays, so I can't >> test this. > > For reference sake, m32r-elf target has overlays, and there's a simulator > in the gdb tree for it. > If one wanted to play with overlay support, that should work, right Michael? > > [m32r was the original target for overlays] Yes, hopefully. I don't know how well maintained is that particular feature...