From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28181 invoked by alias); 22 Jun 2009 18:10:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 28172 invoked by uid 22791); 22 Jun 2009 18:10:06 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from smtp-outbound-2.vmware.com (HELO smtp-outbound-2.vmware.com) (65.115.85.73) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 22 Jun 2009 18:10:01 +0000 Received: from mailhost4.vmware.com (mailhost4.vmware.com [10.16.67.124]) by smtp-outbound-2.vmware.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA59C4900E; Mon, 22 Jun 2009 11:09:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.20.94.141] (msnyder-server.eng.vmware.com [10.20.94.141]) by mailhost4.vmware.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E033DC9EFA; Mon, 22 Jun 2009 11:09:56 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4A3FC8CA.5070700@vmware.com> Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 18:10:00 -0000 From: Michael Snyder User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (X11/20080411) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Paul Pluzhnikov CC: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" , "dje@google.com" Subject: Re: [patch] Fix for gdb.threads/staticthreads.exp failure on Linux References: <20090605222214.66E2976BC4@localhost> <8ac60eac0906151139w23c6cc2ag9307d73232753f65@mail.gmail.com> <8ac60eac0906220910p5750f455u1e3dc462035d50b6@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <8ac60eac0906220910p5750f455u1e3dc462035d50b6@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-06/txt/msg00570.txt.bz2 Paul Pluzhnikov wrote: > On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 11:39 AM, Paul Pluzhnikov wrote: >> On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 3:22 PM, Paul Pluzhnikov wrote: >> >>> Attached patch silently ignores such errors, and makes staticthreads PASS. >> Ping? > > Ping, Ping? Paul, I don't see these FAILs on i686, so it's difficult to have an opinion. Have you, or could you, run regression testing in i686?