From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16481 invoked by alias); 22 Jun 2009 03:46:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 16473 invoked by uid 22791); 22 Jun 2009 03:46:35 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from smtp-outbound-1.vmware.com (HELO smtp-outbound-1.vmware.com) (65.115.85.69) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 22 Jun 2009 03:46:29 +0000 Received: from jupiter.vmware.com (mailhost5.vmware.com [10.16.68.131]) by smtp-outbound-1.vmware.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C61493903B; Sun, 21 Jun 2009 20:46:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.20.94.141] (msnyder-server.eng.vmware.com [10.20.94.141]) by jupiter.vmware.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAF0FDC4EB; Sun, 21 Jun 2009 20:46:27 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4A3EFE6F.8000407@vmware.com> Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 03:46:00 -0000 From: Michael Snyder User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (X11/20080411) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Marc Khouzam CC: Hui Zhu , "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" Subject: Re: [RFA] Patch to fix "reverse-step" command error References: <4A3EBE3D.3090703@vmware.com> <6D19CA8D71C89C43A057926FE0D4ADAA07A02E7B@ecamlmw720.eamcs.ericsson.se> In-Reply-To: <6D19CA8D71C89C43A057926FE0D4ADAA07A02E7B@ecamlmw720.eamcs.ericsson.se> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-06/txt/msg00558.txt.bz2 Marc Khouzam wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Michael Snyder [mailto:msnyder@vmware.com] >> Sent: June-21-09 7:12 PM >> To: Hui Zhu >> Cc: Marc Khouzam; gdb-patches@sourceware.org >> Subject: Re: [RFA] Patch to fix "reverse-step" command error >> >> Hui Zhu wrote: >>> PING >> Hui, Marc, I just posted a new patch that should replace this one. >> Please review >> http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2009-06/msg00551.html > > Thanks for that. > > I don't have my SLED right now, which is where I could see the > problem. I may be able to get my hands on one the week after next. > If Hui hasn't been able to test this until that time, then > I will give it a try myself. By the way, I was able to see the mis-behavior on RHEL4.