From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-64607-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 10725 invoked by alias); 18 Jun 2009 23:56:49 -0000
Received: (qmail 10717 invoked by uid 22791); 18 Jun 2009 23:56:49 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from smtp-outbound-2.vmware.com (HELO smtp-outbound-2.vmware.com) (65.115.85.73)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 18 Jun 2009 23:56:43 +0000
Received: from jupiter.vmware.com (mailhost5.vmware.com [10.16.68.131]) 	by smtp-outbound-2.vmware.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2666915005; 	Thu, 18 Jun 2009 16:56:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.20.94.141] (msnyder-server.eng.vmware.com [10.20.94.141]) 	by jupiter.vmware.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D35BDC565; 	Thu, 18 Jun 2009 16:56:42 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4A3AD438.40505@vmware.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 23:56:00 -0000
From: Michael Snyder <msnyder@vmware.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (X11/20080411)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Michael Snyder <msnyder@vmware.com>
CC: Marc Khouzam <marc.khouzam@ericsson.com>,   Hui Zhu <teawater@gmail.com>,  "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [RFA] Patch to fix "reverse-next" command error
References: <daef60380901220100v55cd8a28u76dae725f85eca8f@mail.gmail.com> 	 <daef60380905052300y20cf1f81y59b945a9a22a8767@mail.gmail.com> 	 <daef60380905110007r3ea2c83chf9889a70b127593c@mail.gmail.com> 	 <daef60380906081918r2eaf63f9l3702055a76bb5b45@mail.gmail.com> 	 <4A35B5CD.1030004@vmware.com> <daef60380906142347m42fd6d0fhb1b7b610d90a0ad1@mail.gmail.com> <6D19CA8D71C89C43A057926FE0D4ADAA079760F1@ecamlmw720.eamcs.ericsson.se> <4A368D36.2080102@vmware.com>
In-Reply-To: <4A368D36.2080102@vmware.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2009-06/txt/msg00494.txt.bz2

Michael Snyder wrote:
> Marc Khouzam wrote:
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org 
>>> [mailto:gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org] On Behalf Of Hui Zhu
>>> Sent: June-15-09 2:47 AM
>>> To: Michael Snyder; Marc Khouzam
>>> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
>>> Subject: Re: [RFA] Patch to fix "reverse-next" command error
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 10:45, Michael 
>>> Snyder<msnyder@vmware.com> wrote:
>>>> Hui Zhu wrote:
>>>>> Ping.
>>>> Hui, I rewrote your patch a little bit.  I think we can use
>>>> gdbarch_skip_trampoline_code to detect the fact that we have
>>>> stepped into a trampoline (ie. "plt").  This is more general.
>>>>
>>>> Mark, please tell me if this patch fixes your original problem,
>>>> and Hui, please tell me if the patch is OK with you.
>>>>
>>> This patch is OK with me.
>> I also tested this one and it works great for me as well.
>>
>> Thanks
> 
> OK, so sounds like this one can go in as well.

... committed.