From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21862 invoked by alias); 3 Jan 2017 15:21:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 21380 invoked by uid 89); 3 Jan 2017 15:21:30 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-5.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=synced, H*i:sk:5cMt30e, H*f:sk:5cMt30e, H*f:tcaFT X-Spam-User: qpsmtpd, 2 recipients X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 Jan 2017 15:21:20 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E43281F01; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 15:21:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.36.116.174] (ovpn-116-174.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.174]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id v03FLHmC024372 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 3 Jan 2017 10:21:18 -0500 Subject: Re: [1/9][RFC][DWARF] Reserve three DW_OP numbers in vendor extension space To: Yao Qi , Jiong Wang References: <72418e98-a400-c503-e8ce-c3fbe1ecc4a7@foss.arm.com> <20161111193859.GJ3541@tucnak.redhat.com> <20161115161817.GL3541@tucnak.redhat.com> <5896be40-51de-55f7-f4a1-4c5af7ff9aec@foss.arm.com> <1479304496.14569.256.camel@redhat.com> <20161116140218.GU3541@tucnak.redhat.com> <07b84003-4e73-8a7f-f949-4c3500e4ffc4@foss.arm.com> <42e05bed-4819-3acb-1e3c-8982910e875f@foss.arm.com> Cc: GDB , Binutils , "Richard Earnshaw (lists)" From: Nick Clifton Message-ID: <49b458a3-861b-cfcb-8c9f-7e49641b5fcc@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2017 15:21:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2017-01/txt/msg00015.txt.bz2 Hi Guys, >> As this patch has got approve from GCC, is it OK to install into >> binutils-gdb master? >> >> My understanding is "include/dwarf2.def" is shared between GDB and >> Binutils. > > "include/dwarf2.def" in binutils-gdb is a copy from gcc, as the comments in > the top explain "This file is part of GCC.". Since the patch was approved in > GCC, you need to commit the patch to GCC repository, and sync > "include/dwarf2.def" from GCC repo to binutils-gdb repo. The last sync > is done by Nick https://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2015-09/msg00330.html I have now sync'ed the binutils copy with the current master copy in the gcc repository. Jiong - if you want to apply your patch to both the gcc and binutils repository, then this is OK with me. Cheers Nick