Pedro Alves wrote:
> 
> In the mean time, your patch is OK.  I'd just move the
> registers_changed call to *after* target_resume, because the 
> target_resume implementation could trigger a register cache
> refetch, thus reintroducing the problem (e.g., it doesn't happen
> on mips *today*, but see e.g., i386-linux-nat.c:i386_linux_resume).  I'd
> put it right after the prepare_to_wait call.
> 
>> 2009-04-20  David Daney  <ddaney@caviumnetworks.com>
>>
>>         * infrun.c (handle_inferior_event): Move registers_changed call down.
>>

This is the version I committed.

Thanks for taking the time to review these.

2009-04-20  David Daney  <ddaney@caviumnetworks.com>

         * infrun.c (handle_inferior_event): Move registers_changed call 
down.