From: David Daney <david.s.daney@gmail.com>
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Cc: David Daney <ddaney@caviumnetworks.com>
Subject: [Patch 1/2] infrun.c support for MIPS hardware watchpoints.
Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2009 06:49:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49D9A5E7.3000003@gmail.com> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 571 bytes --]
For targets that are gdbarch_software_single_step_p (like MIPS), we need to use software single stepping when stepping over a watchpoint. The existing code that sets up software single step was in resume().
This patch factors the software single step code into a new function, set_for_singlestep(), and then calls it from handle_inferior_event() when we need to step over a watchpoint. This is a prerequisite for the following patch that adds MIPS hardware watchpoint support.
Tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu (Fedora 10) with no regressions found.
OK to commit?
[-- Attachment #2: infrun.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 2892 bytes --]
2009-04-05 David Daney <ddaney@caviumnetworks.com>
* infrun.c (set_for_singlestep): New function.
(resume): Call set_for_singlestep.
(handle_inferior_event): Same.
Index: infrun.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/infrun.c,v
retrieving revision 1.367
diff -u -p -r1.367 infrun.c
--- infrun.c 25 Mar 2009 21:53:10 -0000 1.367
+++ infrun.c 6 Apr 2009 05:45:38 -0000
@@ -950,6 +950,28 @@ set_schedlock_func (char *args, int from
}
}
+/* Try to setup for software single stepping over the specified location.
+ Return 1 if target_resume() should use hardware single step.
+
+ GDBARCH the current gdbarch.
+ PC the location to step over. */
+static int
+set_for_singlestep (struct gdbarch *gdbarch, CORE_ADDR pc)
+{
+ int step = 1;
+
+ if (gdbarch_software_single_step_p (gdbarch)
+ && gdbarch_software_single_step (gdbarch, get_current_frame ()))
+ {
+ step = 0;
+ /* Do not pull these breakpoints until after a `wait' in
+ `wait_for_inferior' */
+ singlestep_breakpoints_inserted_p = 1;
+ singlestep_ptid = inferior_ptid;
+ singlestep_pc = pc;
+ }
+ return step;
+}
/* Resume the inferior, but allow a QUIT. This is useful if the user
wants to interrupt some lengthy single-stepping operation
@@ -1031,20 +1053,9 @@ a command like `return' or `jump' to con
}
}
- if (step && gdbarch_software_single_step_p (gdbarch))
- {
- /* Do it the hard way, w/temp breakpoints */
- if (gdbarch_software_single_step (gdbarch, get_current_frame ()))
- {
- /* ...and don't ask hardware to do it. */
- step = 0;
- /* and do not pull these breakpoints until after a `wait' in
- `wait_for_inferior' */
- singlestep_breakpoints_inserted_p = 1;
- singlestep_ptid = inferior_ptid;
- singlestep_pc = pc;
- }
- }
+ /* Do we need to do it the hard way, w/temp breakpoints? */
+ if (step)
+ step = set_for_singlestep (gdbarch, pc);
/* If there were any forks/vforks/execs that were caught and are
now to be followed, then do so. */
@@ -2826,11 +2837,14 @@ targets should add new threads to the th
the inferior over it. If we have non-steppable watchpoints,
we must disable the current watchpoint; it's simplest to
disable all watchpoints and breakpoints. */
-
+ int step_over_watchpoint = 1;
+
if (!HAVE_STEPPABLE_WATCHPOINT)
remove_breakpoints ();
registers_changed ();
- target_resume (ecs->ptid, 1, TARGET_SIGNAL_0); /* Single step */
+ /* Single step */
+ step_over_watchpoint = set_for_singlestep (current_gdbarch, read_pc ());
+ target_resume (ecs->ptid, step_over_watchpoint, TARGET_SIGNAL_0);
waiton_ptid = ecs->ptid;
if (HAVE_STEPPABLE_WATCHPOINT)
infwait_state = infwait_step_watch_state;
next reply other threads:[~2009-04-06 6:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-06 6:49 David Daney [this message]
2009-04-11 17:16 ` Pedro Alves
2009-04-14 1:23 ` David Daney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49D9A5E7.3000003@gmail.com \
--to=david.s.daney@gmail.com \
--cc=ddaney@caviumnetworks.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox