Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Daney <david.s.daney@gmail.com>
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Cc: David Daney <ddaney@caviumnetworks.com>
Subject: [Patch 1/2] infrun.c support for MIPS hardware watchpoints.
Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2009 06:49:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <49D9A5E7.3000003@gmail.com> (raw)

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 571 bytes --]

For targets that are gdbarch_software_single_step_p (like MIPS), we need to use software single stepping when stepping over a watchpoint.  The existing code that sets up software single step was in resume().

This patch factors the software single step code into a new function, set_for_singlestep(), and then calls it from handle_inferior_event() when we need to step over a watchpoint.  This is a prerequisite for the following patch that adds MIPS hardware watchpoint support.

Tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu (Fedora 10) with no regressions found.

OK to commit?


[-- Attachment #2: infrun.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 2892 bytes --]

2009-04-05  David Daney  <ddaney@caviumnetworks.com>

	* infrun.c (set_for_singlestep): New function.
	(resume): Call set_for_singlestep.
	(handle_inferior_event): Same.


Index: infrun.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/infrun.c,v
retrieving revision 1.367
diff -u -p -r1.367 infrun.c
--- infrun.c	25 Mar 2009 21:53:10 -0000	1.367
+++ infrun.c	6 Apr 2009 05:45:38 -0000
@@ -950,6 +950,28 @@ set_schedlock_func (char *args, int from
     }
 }
 
+/* Try to setup for software single stepping over the specified location.
+   Return 1 if target_resume() should use hardware single step.
+
+   GDBARCH the current gdbarch.
+   PC the location to step over.  */
+static int
+set_for_singlestep (struct gdbarch *gdbarch, CORE_ADDR pc)
+{
+  int step = 1;
+
+  if (gdbarch_software_single_step_p (gdbarch)
+      && gdbarch_software_single_step (gdbarch, get_current_frame ()))
+    {
+      step = 0;
+      /* Do not pull these breakpoints until after a `wait' in
+	 `wait_for_inferior' */
+      singlestep_breakpoints_inserted_p = 1;
+      singlestep_ptid = inferior_ptid;
+      singlestep_pc = pc;
+    }
+  return step;
+}
 
 /* Resume the inferior, but allow a QUIT.  This is useful if the user
    wants to interrupt some lengthy single-stepping operation
@@ -1031,20 +1053,9 @@ a command like `return' or `jump' to con
 	}
     }
 
-  if (step && gdbarch_software_single_step_p (gdbarch))
-    {
-      /* Do it the hard way, w/temp breakpoints */
-      if (gdbarch_software_single_step (gdbarch, get_current_frame ()))
-        {
-          /* ...and don't ask hardware to do it.  */
-          step = 0;
-          /* and do not pull these breakpoints until after a `wait' in
-          `wait_for_inferior' */
-          singlestep_breakpoints_inserted_p = 1;
-          singlestep_ptid = inferior_ptid;
-          singlestep_pc = pc;
-        }
-    }
+  /* Do we need to do it the hard way, w/temp breakpoints?  */
+  if (step)
+      step = set_for_singlestep (gdbarch, pc);
 
   /* If there were any forks/vforks/execs that were caught and are
      now to be followed, then do so.  */
@@ -2826,11 +2837,14 @@ targets should add new threads to the th
 	 the inferior over it.  If we have non-steppable watchpoints,
 	 we must disable the current watchpoint; it's simplest to
 	 disable all watchpoints and breakpoints.  */
-	 
+      int step_over_watchpoint = 1;
+
       if (!HAVE_STEPPABLE_WATCHPOINT)
 	remove_breakpoints ();
       registers_changed ();
-      target_resume (ecs->ptid, 1, TARGET_SIGNAL_0);	/* Single step */
+	/* Single step */
+      step_over_watchpoint = set_for_singlestep (current_gdbarch, read_pc ());
+      target_resume (ecs->ptid, step_over_watchpoint, TARGET_SIGNAL_0);
       waiton_ptid = ecs->ptid;
       if (HAVE_STEPPABLE_WATCHPOINT)
 	infwait_state = infwait_step_watch_state;

             reply	other threads:[~2009-04-06  6:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-04-06  6:49 David Daney [this message]
2009-04-11 17:16 ` Pedro Alves
2009-04-14  1:23   ` David Daney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=49D9A5E7.3000003@gmail.com \
    --to=david.s.daney@gmail.com \
    --cc=ddaney@caviumnetworks.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox