From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-62634-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 29096 invoked by alias); 2 Apr 2009 08:52:04 -0000
Received: (qmail 29086 invoked by uid 22791); 2 Apr 2009 08:52:04 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.2 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from eu1sys200aog110.obsmtp.com (HELO eu1sys200aog110.obsmtp.com) (207.126.144.129)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Apr 2009 08:51:55 +0000
Received: from source ([164.129.1.35]) (using TLSv1) by eu1sys200aob110.postini.com ([207.126.147.11]) with SMTP 	ID DSNKSdR8f89PDuQmGyN8Jsn/HBMDwom8VXuv@postini.com; Thu, 02 Apr 2009 08:51:55 UTC
Received: from zeta.dmz-eu.st.com (ns2.st.com [164.129.230.9]) 	by beta.dmz-eu.st.com (STMicroelectronics) with ESMTP 	id CA8CEDB3A; Thu,  2 Apr 2009 08:50:02 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from mail2.gnb.st.com (mail2.gnb.st.com [164.129.119.59]) 	by zeta.dmz-eu.st.com (STMicroelectronics) with ESMTP id 8A8994BF76; 	Thu,  2 Apr 2009 08:51:06 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from [164.129.122.46] (gnx2504.gnb.st.com [164.129.122.46]) 	by mail2.gnb.st.com (MOS 3.8.7a) 	with ESMTP id DBP88613 (AUTH lyon); 	Thu, 2 Apr 2009 10:51:03 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <49D47C75.9000206@st.com>
Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2009 08:52:00 -0000
From: Christophe LYON <christophe.lyon@st.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090302)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] obvious pattern fix in gdb.base/step-line.exp
References: <49CCDB3D.5010302@st.com> <20090327184726.GW9472@adacore.com> <49D083FB.6020108@st.com> <20090330170216.GB9472@adacore.com> <49D21E7E.8080708@st.com> <20090401183240.GD8766@adacore.com>
In-Reply-To: <20090401183240.GD8766@adacore.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2009-04/txt/msg00028.txt.bz2

On 01.04.2009 20:32, Joel Brobecker wrote:
>> But I am not 100% sure how to interpret the ANSI C spec regarding the  
>> #line directive: when the name of the source file has no path (as in  
>> step-line.c, where #line xx "step-line.c" is used), which path should be  
>> considered?
> 
> Not sure either. Perhaps it's just unspecified?
> 
I would say so, too.


> I'm OK with leaving the testcase untouched if we don't need to.
OK. So I won't commit my patch, and fix the compiler instead.

Thanks
Christophe.