From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19488 invoked by alias); 27 Mar 2009 17:17:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 19210 invoked by uid 22791); 27 Mar 2009 17:17:42 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,J_CHICKENPOX_93,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx2.redhat.com (HELO mx2.redhat.com) (66.187.237.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 Mar 2009 17:17:33 +0000 Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (int-mx2.corp.redhat.com [172.16.27.26]) by mx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n2RHFVH7020338; Fri, 27 Mar 2009 13:15:31 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n2RHFNWn024416; Fri, 27 Mar 2009 13:15:23 -0400 Received: from lindt.uglyboxes.com (sebastian-int.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.221]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n2RHFO8G006461; Fri, 27 Mar 2009 13:15:29 -0400 Message-ID: <49CD099F.9040009@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 17:19:00 -0000 From: Keith Seitz User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090105) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Pedro Alves CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFC] Special casing dtors? References: <49CAB139.8010100@redhat.com> <20090327022150.GC29050@caradoc.them.org> <49CC3B5D.3060706@redhat.com> <200903271439.40901.pedro@codesourcery.com> In-Reply-To: <200903271439.40901.pedro@codesourcery.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-03/txt/msg00634.txt.bz2 Pedro Alves wrote: > I regtested the whole testsuite with stabs on x86_64-linux, and > got this with your patch: > > -PASS: gdb.cp/templates.exp: destructor breakpoint > -PASS: gdb.cp/templates.exp: value method breakpoint > +FAIL: gdb.cp/templates.exp: destructor_breakpoint (timeout) > +FAIL: gdb.cp/templates.exp: value method breakpoint To be clear: You are getting two new FAILs with the patch? That would be baffling -- I don't see how the templates.exp test "destructor breakpoint" could pass on anything using gcc. > You can try stabs with: > > make check RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board=unix/gdb:debug_flags=-gstabs+ templates.exp" I'll give this a shot. And thank you for checking out the patch. Keith