From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17661 invoked by alias); 16 Mar 2009 15:22:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 17644 invoked by uid 22791); 16 Mar 2009 15:22:12 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-ew0-f179.google.com (HELO mail-ew0-f179.google.com) (209.85.219.179) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 Mar 2009 15:22:02 +0000 Received: by ewy27 with SMTP id 27so3638313ewy.24 for ; Mon, 16 Mar 2009 08:22:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.8.78 with SMTP id 56mr1848047weq.210.1237216919939; Mon, 16 Mar 2009 08:21:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scientist-2.mobile.usilu.net ([195.176.179.202]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 6sm7124114nfv.24.2009.03.16.08.21.58 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 16 Mar 2009 08:21:59 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <49BE6EAD.1090004@gnu.org> Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 16:00:00 -0000 From: Paolo Bonzini User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Macintosh/20081209) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Joel Brobecker CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, Tristan Gingold , binutils@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA/commit?] Add gdb to the list of supported dirs on x86_64-darwin References: <20090316150056.GE9069@adacore.com> In-Reply-To: <20090316150056.GE9069@adacore.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-03/txt/msg00263.txt.bz2 Joel Brobecker wrote: > Hello, > > I found this patch from Tristan Gingold from one of our source trees... > It's one of two very small patches that allow us to build GDB on > x86_64-darwin (right now, we only support x86-darwin), so I thought > I'd contribute it. > > I'm not exactly clear who has jurisdiction over this type of change. > This file is in the root directory. If I understand the MAINTAINERS > file correctly, it looks like any Global Maintainer from either GCC, > or Binutils, or GDB, etc, can approve it? (I'm GM for GDB) It clearly affects only gdb. Go ahead, but please commit it to the gcc repository too. Paolo