From: Michael Snyder <msnyder@vmware.com>
To: "Sérgio Durigan Júnior" <sergiodj@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>,
"gdb-patches@sourceware.org" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: RFC: "info proc map" for corefiles
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 21:44:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <494AC2D3.9090705@vmware.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1229626216.6602.15.camel@miki>
Sérgio Durigan Júnior wrote:
> Hello Mark,
>
> On Thu, 2008-12-18 at 19:46 +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
>
>> This looks pretty cool, but I think having this as "info proc"
>> subcommand is wrong:
>>
>> (gdb) help info
>> ...
>> info proc -- Show /proc process information about any running process
>> ...
>>
>> Corefiles have nothing to do with /proc and many operating systems
>> don't even have such a thing.
>
> All right, good point. Do you have any suggestion for this? Should I
> create another class of command?
"info core"?
There are probably a bunch of things we could expose about a
core file that would not make sense for a process, and vice versa.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-12-18 21:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-12-18 17:19 Sérgio Durigan Júnior
2008-12-18 18:47 ` Mark Kettenis
2008-12-18 18:51 ` Sérgio Durigan Júnior
2008-12-18 21:44 ` Michael Snyder [this message]
2008-12-19 15:54 ` Sérgio Durigan Júnior
2008-12-19 16:04 ` Mark Kettenis
2008-12-19 16:06 ` Tom Tromey
2008-12-19 16:24 ` Sérgio Durigan Júnior
2008-12-19 19:37 ` Eli Zaretskii
2008-12-19 19:46 ` Michael Snyder
2008-12-22 15:35 ` Sérgio Durigan Júnior
2008-12-22 16:28 ` Tom Tromey
2008-12-22 19:37 ` Eli Zaretskii
2008-12-22 19:55 ` Sérgio Durigan Júnior
2008-12-22 20:04 ` Eli Zaretskii
2008-12-22 20:26 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-12-22 22:19 ` Eli Zaretskii
2008-12-22 22:52 ` Mark Kettenis
2008-12-29 19:56 ` Sérgio Durigan Júnior
2008-12-19 16:25 ` Eli Zaretskii
2008-12-19 18:09 ` Sérgio Durigan Júnior
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=494AC2D3.9090705@vmware.com \
--to=msnyder@vmware.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl \
--cc=sergiodj@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox