From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30117 invoked by alias); 18 Dec 2008 08:33:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 30079 invoked by uid 22791); 18 Dec 2008 08:33:09 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from oden.vtab.com (HELO oden.vtab.com) (62.20.90.195) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 18 Dec 2008 08:32:34 +0000 Received: from oden.vtab.com (oden.vtab.com [127.0.0.1]) by oden.vtab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B255826F69C; Thu, 18 Dec 2008 09:32:28 +0100 (CET) Received: from jessica.hq.vtech (jessica.hq.vtech [10.0.0.70]) by oden.vtab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EDD426F697; Thu, 18 Dec 2008 09:32:28 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <494A0A9C.6020809@virtutech.com> Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 08:33:00 -0000 From: Tomas Holmberg User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.18 (X11/20081119) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Vladimir Prus CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: reverse for GDB/MI References: <49463870.6080302@virtutech.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-12/txt/msg00319.txt.bz2 > I am not quite sure about adding new set of commands for that. Can we use > --reverse option, thereby not introducing new commands? Adding a reverse option to the existing commands is possible. But I do not think it is a good idea. It is not always obvious what should happen when running a standard command in reverse. I consider the reverse commands as a new set commands and not a variant of the old. /tomas