From: Michael Snyder <msnyder@vmware.com>
To: teawater <teawater@gmail.com>
Cc: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [RFA] Resubmit process record and replay, 4/10
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 04:21:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4924C15D.20606@vmware.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <daef60380811160020h3ad1447bh49a3428f21059206@mail.gmail.com>
Seems like a couple of people had some doubts about this
particular part of the implementation.
Does anyone have any alternative suggestions?
teawater wrote:
> The process record and replay target has six function pointers
> record_beneath_to_resume, record_beneath_to_wait,
> record_beneath_to_prepare_to_store, record_beneath_to_xfer_partial,
> record_beneath_to_insert_breakpoint and
> record_beneath_to_remove_breakpoint.
> This patch add code to function "update_current_target" make these
> pointers always point to the function of lower strata target than
> process record and replay target.
>
> When GDB in record mode, we need to call the really debug function in
> low strata target because process record and replay target need call
> this function to control the inferior.
>
> Struct target_ops already has a pointer "beneath" point to low strata
> target, but process record and replay target doesn't use it. Because
> if low strata target doesn't set some function pointers, process
> record and replay target will need to call the function pointers of
> the target that is low strata target of this target. If this target
> doesn't set them too, it will need to call anothers. So use "beneath"
> is not a good choice and "multi-thread" target that need function
> pointers of low strata target doesn't use "beneath" too.
>
> 2008-11-16 Hui Zhu <teawater@gmail.com>
>
> * target.c (update_current_target): Set function points
> record_beneath_to_resume,
> record_beneath_to_wait,
> record_beneath_to_prepare_to_store,
> record_beneath_to_xfer_partial,
> record_beneath_to_insert_breakpoint
> and record_beneath_to_remove_breakpoint point to the function
> of target that lower than process record and replay target.
>
> target.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+)
>
> Following is the diff with the previous patch:
> @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
>
> static void target_info (char *, int);
>
> -@@ -387,6 +388,12 @@ update_current_target (void)
> +@@ -405,6 +406,12 @@
> if (!current_target.FIELD) \
> current_target.FIELD = (TARGET)->FIELD
>
> @@ -21,12 +21,12 @@
> for (t = target_stack; t; t = t->beneath)
> {
> INHERIT (to_shortname, t);
> -@@ -476,6 +483,35 @@ update_current_target (void)
> +@@ -494,6 +501,35 @@
> /* Do not inherit to_memory_map. */
> /* Do not inherit to_flash_erase. */
> /* Do not inherit to_flash_done. */
> +
> -+ /* Set the real beneath function pointers. */
> ++ /* Set pointers to functions in the target beneath us. */
> + if (t != &record_ops)
> + {
> + if (!record_beneath_to_resume)
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> --- a/target.c
> +++ b/target.c
> @@ -41,6 +41,7 @@
> #include "target-descriptions.h"
> #include "gdbthread.h"
> #include "solib.h"
> +#include "record.h"
>
> static void target_info (char *, int);
>
> @@ -405,6 +406,12 @@
> if (!current_target.FIELD) \
> current_target.FIELD = (TARGET)->FIELD
>
> + record_beneath_to_resume = NULL;
> + record_beneath_to_store_registers = NULL;
> + record_beneath_to_xfer_partial = NULL;
> + record_beneath_to_insert_breakpoint = NULL;
> + record_beneath_to_remove_breakpoint = NULL;
> +
> for (t = target_stack; t; t = t->beneath)
> {
> INHERIT (to_shortname, t);
> @@ -494,6 +501,35 @@
> /* Do not inherit to_memory_map. */
> /* Do not inherit to_flash_erase. */
> /* Do not inherit to_flash_done. */
> +
> + /* Set pointers to functions in the target beneath us. */
> + if (t != &record_ops)
> + {
> + if (!record_beneath_to_resume)
> + {
> + record_beneath_to_resume = t->to_resume;
> + }
> + if (!record_beneath_to_wait)
> + {
> + record_beneath_to_wait = t->to_wait;
> + }
> + if (!record_beneath_to_store_registers)
> + {
> + record_beneath_to_store_registers = t->to_store_registers;
> + }
> + if (!record_beneath_to_xfer_partial)
> + {
> + record_beneath_to_xfer_partial = t->to_xfer_partial;
> + }
> + if (!record_beneath_to_insert_breakpoint)
> + {
> + record_beneath_to_insert_breakpoint = t->to_insert_breakpoint;
> + }
> + if (!record_beneath_to_remove_breakpoint)
> + {
> + record_beneath_to_remove_breakpoint = t->to_remove_breakpoint;
> + }
> + }
> }
> #undef INHERIT
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-11-20 1:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-11-16 23:37 teawater
2008-11-20 4:21 ` Michael Snyder [this message]
2008-11-20 4:25 ` Pedro Alves
2008-11-20 6:42 ` Michael Snyder
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4924C15D.20606@vmware.com \
--to=msnyder@vmware.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=teawater@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox