Re: [RFA] Darwin/x86 port (v2 - part 0)

Eli Zaretskii
2008-11-14T15:32:11Z

> Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 07:06:00 -0800
> From: Stan Shebs <stan@codesourcery.com>
> CC: Stan Shebs <stan@codesourcery.com>, Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
>
> > # of expected passes 4299
> > # of unexpected failures 3107
> Hmmm, that's kind of high, even for an initial port. Is it mainly that
> shared library bits are missing, or something else?
>
> My natural inclination is to accept the code into the trunk after review
> - I suspect that the next round of changes will be more invasive into
> the rest of GDB, and it would be easier to consider each of those
> separately from the basic port. But, I have a track record of being too
> optimistic on this strategy, ahem. :-) What do other people think?

I'd like to know whether there are any large sets of failed tests that
have something in common (a.k.a. unsupported GDB features), before I
make up my mind.