From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29070 invoked by alias); 13 Nov 2008 18:04:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 29017 invoked by uid 22791); 13 Nov 2008 18:04:37 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail.codesourcery.com (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (65.74.133.4) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 13 Nov 2008 18:04:00 +0000 Received: (qmail 18525 invoked from network); 13 Nov 2008 18:03:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO macbook-2.local) (stan@127.0.0.2) by mail.codesourcery.com with ESMTPA; 13 Nov 2008 18:03:58 -0000 Message-ID: <491C6C09.4050300@codesourcery.com> Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 21:41:00 -0000 From: Stan Shebs User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Macintosh/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tristan Gingold CC: Mark Kettenis , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFA] Darwin/x86 port (v2 - part 0) References: <3A152A70-4355-440D-839F-A4EAC36C530B@adacore.com> <200811131452.mADEq21U018058@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <406742BB-4F37-406B-B4E3-75C8DD2DBD03@adacore.com> In-Reply-To: <406742BB-4F37-406B-B4E3-75C8DD2DBD03@adacore.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-11/txt/msg00290.txt.bz2 Tristan Gingold wrote: > > On Nov 13, 2008, at 3:52 PM, Mark Kettenis wrote: >>> is there any remaining work to do before getting the approval ? >> >> Hmm, it seems something (you?) keeps spamming the lists with v2 of the >> diff whereas I thought you already had a v3 diff. I'm afraid I >> completely lost track of what is what. > > Although there might be something wrong here, I don't see these mails > in the archives. > Can you sent me privately these spams ? We will try to fix that. I think it's just that you updated some parts to v3, while others are still at v2. When I sorted my mailbox by sender, it became much clearer. There's nothing wrong, it's just that you've been so responsive that there's not the usual multi-week gap between one rev of the patch and the next. :-) Anyway, I'm the most logical reviewer for the bulk of native support, I'll give you some feedback in the next few days. In the meantime, please run the testsuite, let's see what the basic numbers are looking like. Stan