From: Michael Snyder <msnyder@vmware.com>
To: Michael Snyder <msnyder@vmware.com>
Cc: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>,
"gdb-patches@sourceware.org" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>,
teawater <teawater@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFA] Handle runtime loader dyn sym resolution in reverse
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 05:00:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4905496E.9080204@vmware.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <490546A7.9020002@vmware.com>
Michael Snyder wrote:
> Joel Brobecker wrote:
>
>>> 2008-10-24 Michael Snyder <msnyder@vmware.com>
>>>
>>> * infrun.c (handle_inferior_event): Handle dynamic symbol
>>> resolution in reverse.
>> Looks OK to me, but I don't understand why you check that stop_func_start
>> is zero. If I were to make a guess, it would be to quickly dismiss
>> the case were we reverse stepped into a function call, and so don't
>> need to check for trampolines (in other words, a CPU saver).
>
> Correct, but it's more than a CPU saver.
> If we are in a function (stop_func_start is non-zero),
> then we can set a step_resume breakpoint and continue,
> which is way faster than single stepping.
>
> We single-step only when we have to, ie. when we have
> actually stepped into the fixup jump table.
The big difference is, 'in_solib_dynsym_resolve_code'
returns true when we're in the dynamic loader function
"_dl_runtime_resolve", but we really don't want to single
step through that. Since it's a function with a minsym,
we can jump over it just like any other function -- but
then we hit the jump table and have to singlestep a few
times.
The test case was sent to me by teawater, who tried to
reverse-next over a printf. GDB handled the printf call
fine, then it stepped into _dl_runtime_resolve, which it
also handled, but it stumbled over the jump table.
Committed, by the way.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-27 5:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-25 3:04 Michael Snyder
2008-10-25 6:50 ` teawater
2008-10-25 16:10 ` Joel Brobecker
2008-10-26 14:15 ` teawater
2008-10-27 4:48 ` Michael Snyder
2008-10-27 5:00 ` Michael Snyder [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4905496E.9080204@vmware.com \
--to=msnyder@vmware.com \
--cc=brobecker@adacore.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=teawater@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox