From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5396 invoked by alias); 6 Oct 2008 21:47:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 5388 invoked by uid 22791); 6 Oct 2008 21:47:12 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from smtp-outbound-1.vmware.com (HELO smtp-outbound-1.vmware.com) (65.113.40.141) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Oct 2008 21:46:25 +0000 Received: from mailhost2.vmware.com (mailhost2.vmware.com [10.16.67.167]) by smtp-outbound-1.vmware.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9667568B5; Mon, 6 Oct 2008 14:46:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.20.92.59] (promb-2s-dhcp59.eng.vmware.com [10.20.92.59]) by mailhost2.vmware.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F9878E5CA; Mon, 6 Oct 2008 14:46:23 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <48EA86C2.1040501@vmware.com> Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2008 21:47:00 -0000 From: Michael Snyder User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (X11/20080411) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Joel Brobecker CC: Pedro Alves , "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" , Daniel Jacobowitz , teawater Subject: Re: [RFA] Reverse Debugging, 3/5 References: <48E3CD0B.8020003@vmware.com> <200810062109.16785.pedro@codesourcery.com> <48EA7A5B.4040701@vmware.com> <200810062214.49011.pedro@codesourcery.com> <20081006212547.GC21853@adacore.com> In-Reply-To: <20081006212547.GC21853@adacore.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-10/txt/msg00179.txt.bz2 Joel Brobecker wrote: >> To me, visual vertical aligment is more distracting than good. It >> distract me from the right -> left assignment flow. But, that's >> just me. I'm not going to make a bid deal out of it. > > Neither am I, but normally, we're supposed to follow the style > that gdb_indent.sh generates... (but I agree that visual vertical > alignment often creates distraction, the only exception is when > you have perhaps 20 lines in a row to align, but then where is > the limit?). OK, consider me out-voted. ;-)