Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Snyder <msnyder@vmware.com>
To: teawater <teawater@gmail.com>
Cc: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [reverse RFC] Fix some bugs
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2008 18:43:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <48D2A09F.30203@vmware.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <daef60380809181016j10cfa81an30464a309a07bce2@mail.gmail.com>

teawater wrote:
> Thanks for the test and bug report of Michael. It help me a lot.
> 
> 2008-09-19  Hui Zhu  <teawater@gmail.com>
> 
>         * record.c (record_wait): Fix the bug of forware step after
>         reverse step.
>         Make debug message more clean.
>         Remove variable record_list_status.
> 
>         * i386-tdep.c (i386_record): Fix the bug of "0x80 ... 0x83".

Hui, are all these changes related?
It looks a little like you might have combined several
smaller changes into one patch.  In order to make review
easier, we like to have unrelated patches submitted separately.

If they are in fact related, could you explain please?
Maybe add a few more comments?

Thanks a lot!


> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> --- a/ChangeLog
> +++ b/ChangeLog
> @@ -1,3 +1,12 @@
> +2008-09-19  Hui Zhu  <teawater@gmail.com>
> +
> +	* record.c (record_wait): Fix the bug of forware step after
> +	reverse step.
> +	Make debug message more clean.
> +	Remove variable record_list_status.
> +
> +	* i386-tdep.c (i386_record): Fix the bug of "0x80 ... 0x83".
> +
>  2008-09-15  Michael Snyder  <msnyder@vmware.com>
>  
>  	* infrun.c (proceed): No need to singlestep over a breakpoint
> --- a/i386-tdep.c
> +++ b/i386-tdep.c
> @@ -3037,11 +3037,7 @@ reswitch:
>  	    }
>  	  else
>  	    {
> -	      if (ot == OT_BYTE)
> -		{
> -		  reg &= 0x3;
> -		}
> -	      if (record_arch_list_add_reg (reg))
> +	      if (record_arch_list_add_reg (rm))
>  		{
>  		  return (-1);
>  		}
> --- a/record.c
> +++ b/record.c
> @@ -33,7 +33,6 @@ int record_debug = 0;
>  
>  record_t record_first;
>  record_t *record_list = &record_first;
> -int record_list_status = 1;	/* 0 normal 1 to the begin 2 to the end */
>  record_t *record_arch_list_head = NULL;
>  record_t *record_arch_list_tail = NULL;
>  struct regcache *record_regcache = NULL;
> @@ -446,7 +445,6 @@ record_open (char *name, int from_tty)
>  
>    /* Reset */
>    record_insn_num = 0;
> -  record_list_status = 1;
>    record_execdir = EXEC_FORWARD;
>    record_list = &record_first;
>    record_list->next = NULL;
> @@ -546,30 +544,31 @@ record_wait (ptid_t ptid, struct target_
>           Then set it to terminal_ours to make GDB get the signal.  */
>        target_terminal_ours ();
>  
> -      /* Loop over the record log, looking for the next place to stop.  */
> +      /* In EXEC_FORWARD mode,, record_list point to the tail of prev
> +         instruction. */
> +      if (record_execdir == EXEC_FORWARD && record_list->next)
> +        {
> +	  record_list = record_list->next;
> +	}
> +
> +      /* Loop over the record_list, looking for the next place to stop.  */
>        do
>  	{
>  	  /* check state */
> -	  if ((record_execdir == EXEC_REVERSE && !record_list->prev
> -	       && record_list_status == 1) 
> -	      || (record_execdir != EXEC_REVERSE
> -		  && !record_list->next
> -		  && record_list_status == 2))
> +	  if (record_execdir == EXEC_REVERSE && record_list == &record_first)
>  	    {
> -	      if (record_list_status == 2)
> -		{
> -		  fprintf_unfiltered (gdb_stdlog,
> -				      "Record: running to the end of record list.\n");
> -		}
> -	      else if (record_list_status == 1)
> -		{
> -		  fprintf_unfiltered (gdb_stdlog,
> -				      "Record: running to the begin of record list.\n");
> -		}
> +	      fprintf_unfiltered (gdb_stdlog,
> +				  "Record: running to the begin of record list.\n");
> +	      stop_soon = STOP_QUIETLY;
> +	      break;
> +	    }
> +	  if (record_execdir != EXEC_REVERSE && !record_list->next)
> +	    {
> +	      fprintf_unfiltered (gdb_stdlog,
> +				  "Record: running to the end of record list.\n");
>  	      stop_soon = STOP_QUIETLY;
>  	      break;
>  	    }
> -	  record_list_status = 0;
>  
>  	  /* set ptid, register and memory according to record_list */
>  	  if (record_list->type == record_reg)
> @@ -579,7 +578,8 @@ record_wait (ptid_t ptid, struct target_
>  	      if (record_debug > 1)
>  		{
>  		  fprintf_unfiltered (gdb_stdlog,
> -				      "Record: record_reg to inferior num = %d.\n",
> +				      "Record: record_reg 0x%s to inferior num = %d.\n",
> +				      paddr_nz ((CORE_ADDR)record_list),
>  				      record_list->u.reg.num);
>  		}
>  	      regcache_cooked_read (regcache, record_list->u.reg.num, reg);
> @@ -594,7 +594,8 @@ record_wait (ptid_t ptid, struct target_
>  	      if (record_debug > 1)
>  		{
>  		  fprintf_unfiltered (gdb_stdlog,
> -				      "Record: record_mem to inferior addr = 0x%s len = %d.\n",
> +				      "Record: record_mem 0x%s to inferior addr = 0x%s len = %d.\n",
> +				      paddr_nz ((CORE_ADDR)record_list),
>  				      paddr_nz (record_list->u.mem.addr),
>  				      record_list->u.mem.len);
>  		}
> @@ -625,19 +626,13 @@ record_wait (ptid_t ptid, struct target_
>  	      if (record_debug > 1)
>  		{
>  		  fprintf_unfiltered (gdb_stdlog,
> -				      "Record: record_end to inferior need_dasm = %d.\n",
> +				      "Record: record_end 0x%s to inferior need_dasm = %d.\n",
> +				      paddr_nz ((CORE_ADDR)record_list),
>  				      record_list->u.need_dasm);
>  		}
>  
>  	      if (record_execdir == EXEC_FORWARD)
>  		{
> -		  if (record_list == &record_first)
> -		    {
> -		      /* The first record_t, not a really record_t.
> -		         Goto next record_t. */
> -		      goto next;
> -		    }
> -
>  		  need_dasm = record_list->u.need_dasm;
>  		}
>  	      if (need_dasm)
> @@ -706,21 +701,19 @@ record_wait (ptid_t ptid, struct target_
>  	    }
>  
>  next:
> -	  if (record_execdir == EXEC_REVERSE)
> -	    {
> -	      if (record_list->prev && continue_flag)
> -		record_list = record_list->prev;
> -	      else
> -		record_list_status = 1;
> -	    }
> -	  else
> +	  if (continue_flag)
>  	    {
> -	      if (record_list->next)
> -		record_list = record_list->next;
> +	      if (record_execdir == EXEC_REVERSE)
> +		{
> +		  if (record_list->prev)
> +		    record_list = record_list->prev;
> +		}
>  	      else
> -		record_list_status = 2;
> +		{
> +		  if (record_list->next)
> +		    record_list = record_list->next;
> +		}
>  	    }
> -
>  	}
>        while (continue_flag);
>  


  reply	other threads:[~2008-09-18 18:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-09-18 17:17 teawater
2008-09-18 18:43 ` Michael Snyder [this message]
2008-09-19  3:37   ` teawater

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=48D2A09F.30203@vmware.com \
    --to=msnyder@vmware.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=teawater@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox