Joel Brobecker wrote:
> 
> Overall, this looks reasonable. I have a few comments, though. See below.
> BTW: I just approved a patch for HP/UX that also deals with permanent
> breakpoints. But fortunately, they don't seem to collide at all. See:
> http://www.sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2008-08/msg00466.html.
> 

I addressed your suggestions; additionally, I moved new code from
create_breakpoint into a new function (bp_loc_permanent). I think that 
makes code clear without additional comments.


Thanks,

Aleksandar Ristovski
QNX Software Systems