Ulrich Weigand wrote:
> 
> It seems the main problem is that NTO at some time copied some of
> the logic from solib-svr4.c, but has not adapted to the changes that
> were added to that file later on.  Not even the definition of struct
> lm_info matches any more!
> 
> Maybe a more correct fix would be to mimic the new solib-svr4.c logic
> and use the l_addr field to cache the load address?
> 

You are right. This is what I did in the new patch (attached).

Thanks,

Aleksandar