From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17126 invoked by alias); 2 Aug 2008 20:07:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 16965 invoked by uid 22791); 2 Aug 2008 20:07:11 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sat, 02 Aug 2008 20:06:17 +0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m72K6FI2021477 for ; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 16:06:15 -0400 Received: from pobox.corp.redhat.com (pobox.corp.redhat.com [10.11.255.20]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m72K6E2A016270; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 16:06:14 -0400 Received: from lindt.uglyboxes.com (sebastian-int.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.221]) by pobox.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m72K6CMQ018110; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 16:06:13 -0400 Message-ID: <4894BE34.1070708@redhat.com> Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2008 20:07:00 -0000 From: Keith Seitz User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080421) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Keith Seitz , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFA] Gdbtk configury changes References: <488A3C85.4000506@redhat.com> <20080726024248.GA1895@caradoc.them.org> <4894BAD3.9090601@redhat.com> <20080802195819.GA18383@caradoc.them.org> In-Reply-To: <20080802195819.GA18383@caradoc.them.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-08/txt/msg00036.txt.bz2 Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > I thought just autoconf would work (it did last time I tried it). Are > you using the autoconf 2.59 release tarball? Otherwise you'll get a > lot of spurious changes. I am using 2.59 from gnu.org, but I kept running into problems with gl_INIT (and one other gl_ macro) being undefined. > Oh, you changed stuff in acinclude.m4. Yes, you might need the > latter. Ah, I see. Okay. Thanks! Keith