From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-57535-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 19056 invoked by alias); 29 Jul 2008 20:34:24 -0000
Received: (qmail 19048 invoked by uid 22791); 29 Jul 2008 20:34:24 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail.codesourcery.com (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (65.74.133.4)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 20:34:06 +0000
Received: (qmail 27094 invoked from network); 29 Jul 2008 20:34:05 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO macbook-2.local) (stan@127.0.0.2)   by mail.codesourcery.com with ESMTPA; 29 Jul 2008 20:34:05 -0000
Message-ID: <488F7EB7.2030508@codesourcery.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 20:34:00 -0000
From: Stan Shebs <stan@codesourcery.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Macintosh/20080707)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
CC: Stan Shebs <stan@codesourcery.com>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: Internals manual fixups
References: <4866823C.5090002@earthlink.net> <usktyytp7.fsf@gnu.org> <488A0594.7020901@codesourcery.com> <uabg5yxw6.fsf@gnu.org>
In-Reply-To: <uabg5yxw6.fsf@gnu.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2008-07/txt/msg00547.txt.bz2

Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>> Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 09:55:48 -0700
>> From: Stan Shebs <stan@codesourcery.com>
>> CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
>>
>>     
>>>> +(Target header files such as
>>>> +@file{gdb/config/@var{arch}/tm-@var{ttt}.h},
>>>> +@file{gdb/config/@var{arch}/tm-@var{arch}.h}, and
>>>> +@file{config/tm-@var{os}.h} are no longer used.)
>>>>     
>>>>         
>>> Then why mention them at all?
>>>   
>>>       
>> Those types of files were in use for many years, and still present in 
>> many versions of GDB. So thinking about it, it seemed that someone 
>> coming from one of those to current GDB would be looking for those 
>> files, and wondering what happened.
>>     
>
> Then perhaps we should have a suitable index entry, because the reader
> can wonder about that any place in the manual.
>   
I committed without making an index entry, because I was waffling on how 
it should look, but I noticed more bits to delete while fixing to 
reflect your previous comments, so there will be a new round of changes 
soon anyway. :-)

Stan