From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29809 invoked by alias); 7 Jul 2008 19:51:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 29794 invoked by uid 22791); 7 Jul 2008 19:51:27 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from elasmtp-scoter.atl.sa.earthlink.net (HELO elasmtp-scoter.atl.sa.earthlink.net) (209.86.89.67) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Jul 2008 19:51:07 +0000 Received: from [68.108.140.244] (helo=macbook-2.local) by elasmtp-scoter.atl.sa.earthlink.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1KFwjo-0001O5-TY; Mon, 07 Jul 2008 15:51:05 -0400 Message-ID: <487273A7.3060900@earthlink.net> Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2008 19:51:00 -0000 From: Stan Shebs User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Macintosh/20080421) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Stan Shebs , Pedro Alves , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Make monitor targets always have a thread References: <200807031623.29562.pedro@codesourcery.com> <20080707191235.GD11544@caradoc.them.org> <48726B91.2050808@earthlink.net> <20080707192210.GA12780@caradoc.them.org> In-Reply-To: <20080707192210.GA12780@caradoc.them.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ELNK-Trace: ae6f8838ff913eba0cc1426638a40ef67e972de0d01da940030e76b8abc0c4afadb05db11492ee4b350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-07/txt/msg00096.txt.bz2 Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 12:16:33PM -0700, Stan Shebs wrote: > >> Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: >> >>> On Thu, Jul 03, 2008 at 04:23:29PM +0100, Pedro Alves wrote: >>> >>> >>>> Does it look OK? Can anyone instruct me how to test this; or do a test >>>> spin for me; or claim that it looks ok, and we'll fix problems as >>>> they arise? :-) >>>> >>>> >>> It's OK. I don't have any way to test monitor either. >>> >>> >> Yeah, I wonder how long it's been since any of those monitor targets have >> been tested, they seem to be bordering on obsolescence. >> > > In theory, someone reported success during my round of code deletion > (~ 18 months ago). I think it was Maciej, but I don't remember. > It occurs to me that one could construct a testing harness by loading a ROM monitor binary into an appropriately configured simulator, but that's way more work and trouble than these bits are worth. :-) Stan