Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 04:55:37PM +0100, Jonathan Larmour wrote:
>> 2008-06-27  Jonathan Larmour  <jifl@eCosCentric.com>
>>
>> 	* remote.c (remote_insert_breakpoint): Ensure that if Z0
>> 	unsupported and we fall back to memory_insert_breakpoint, we
>> 	use the unmodified requested address.
> 
> Thanks for the clear explanation.  This is almost OK - but you need to
> update bp_tgt if Z0 succeeds.  Otherwise we may remove the breakpoint
> incorrectly.

Is this better?

Jifl
-- 
eCosCentric Limited      http://www.eCosCentric.com/     The eCos experts
Barnwell House, Barnwell Drive, Cambridge, UK.       Tel: +44 1223 245571
Registered in England and Wales: Reg No 4422071.
------["Si fractum non sit, noli id reficere"]------       Opinions==mine