From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1298 invoked by alias); 9 May 2008 12:59:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 1290 invoked by uid 22791); 9 May 2008 12:59:01 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from s200aog16.obsmtp.com (HELO s200aog16.obsmtp.com) (207.126.144.130) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 May 2008 12:58:39 +0000 Received: from source ([164.129.1.35]) (using TLSv1) by eu1sys200aob016.postini.com ([207.126.147.11]) with SMTP; Fri, 09 May 2008 12:57:02 UTC Received: from zeta.dmz-eu.st.com (ns2.st.com [164.129.230.9]) by beta.dmz-eu.st.com (STMicroelectronics) with ESMTP id 53DE0DA94; Fri, 9 May 2008 12:56:56 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail1.bri.st.com (mail1.bri.st.com [164.129.8.218]) by zeta.dmz-eu.st.com (STMicroelectronics) with ESMTP id 130134BF70; Fri, 9 May 2008 12:56:56 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [164.129.12.194] (bri0669.bri.st.com [164.129.12.194]) by mail1.bri.st.com (MOS 3.7.5a-GA) with ESMTP id CKE04815 (AUTH stubbsa); Fri, 9 May 2008 13:56:01 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <48244A17.4010901@st.com> Date: Fri, 09 May 2008 19:20:00 -0000 From: Andrew STUBBS User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Windows/20080421) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Pedro Alves , gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: [RFC] 09/10 Add "continue --all" References: <200805061649.50105.pedro@codesourcery.com> <20080509014720.GB22833@caradoc.them.org> <200805090307.47327.pedro@codesourcery.com> <200805091308.28842.pedro@codesourcery.com> <20080509122003.GA24290@caradoc.them.org> In-Reply-To: <20080509122003.GA24290@caradoc.them.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-05/txt/msg00318.txt.bz2 Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > If you don't like the all prefix then we can go back to continue > --all, or even just continue all. Continue takes a numeric argument > and all will not conflict. That doesn't sound very future proof. Somebody might like to refer to named threads some day (our thread implementation has names, although the debugger doesn't accept them as input just yet). How about just "continueall" and "ca"? Andrew