From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4466 invoked by alias); 4 Apr 2008 15:07:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 4385 invoked by uid 22791); 4 Apr 2008 15:07:19 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from smtp2.poczta.onet.pl (HELO smtp2.poczta.onet.pl) (213.180.130.30) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Apr 2008 15:06:59 +0000 Received: from static-62-233-152-148.devs.futuro.pl ([62.233.152.148]:1691 "EHLO [10.0.0.62]" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by ps2.test.onet.pl with ESMTPSA id S184549489AbYDDPGzyaLSy (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Apr 2008 17:06:55 +0200 Message-ID: <47F64410.5000907@op.pl> Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2008 15:52:00 -0000 From: Bogdan Slusarczyk User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: multiple breakpoint - is "Cannot insert breakpoint <..>. Error accessing memory address <..>" correct for location? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-04/txt/msg00100.txt.bz2 Hi, I have situation when gdb cannot set multiple breakpoint at specific location. Suppose I have breakpoint with number 1, which has 3 locations, but one of them cannot be set. Gdb returns: "Cannot insert breakpoint 1. Error accessing memory address 0x111111.". I'm wondering that this message is ok, because it's not true that whole breakpoint cannot be set. Question is: will message "Cannot insert breakpoint 1.1" be ok? or something similar, maybe: "Cannot insert location 1.1"? Accurate location number will help if you want to for example disable such location. Can you suggest which way is better? Regards, Bogdan