From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3997 invoked by alias); 27 Mar 2008 12:15:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 3988 invoked by uid 22791); 27 Mar 2008 12:15:45 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mtagate4.de.ibm.com (HELO mtagate4.de.ibm.com) (195.212.29.153) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 27 Mar 2008 12:15:13 +0000 Received: from d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com (d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com [9.149.167.49]) by mtagate4.de.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m2RCFArM263936 for ; Thu, 27 Mar 2008 12:15:10 GMT Received: from d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com [9.149.165.228]) by d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v8.7) with ESMTP id m2RCFAwY3612920 for ; Thu, 27 Mar 2008 13:15:10 +0100 Received: from d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id m2RCF9IQ021284 for ; Thu, 27 Mar 2008 13:15:10 +0100 Received: from bbkeks.de.ibm.com (dyn-9-152-248-39.boeblingen.de.ibm.com [9.152.248.39]) by d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id m2RCF8YM021263 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 27 Mar 2008 13:15:09 +0100 Message-ID: <47EB8FCC.7070509@de.ibm.com> Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2008 12:15:00 -0000 From: Markus Deuling User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080213) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel Jacobowitz , GDB Patches Subject: Re: FAILs on x86? References: <47EB86DF.10803@de.ibm.com> <20080327115104.GA27230@caradoc.them.org> In-Reply-To: <20080327115104.GA27230@caradoc.them.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-03/txt/msg00422.txt.bz2 Daniel Jacobowitz schrieb: > On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 12:37:03PM +0100, Markus Deuling wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I see lots of FAILs on x86. Anyone else seeing this? > > Not me. What's in gdb.log for a typical failure? > Nothing special, I think (I dont think its an environment problem). Just a lot of FAILs in gdb.{base,cp,mi}. I posted a list of the FAILs that are new compared to a testrun some days ago here: http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-testers/2008-q1/msg00022.html As far as I see there were some commits to some areas where GDB test fails now (gdb.cp, gdb.mi, dfp). If needed I can attach gdb.log -- Markus Deuling GNU Toolchain for Linux on Cell BE deuling@de.ibm.com