Ulrich Weigand wrote:
> 
>> +v:struct core_regset_section *:core_regset_sections:const char *name, int len::::default_regset_sections::(char *) '0'
> 
> Not '0' -- just 0.  (That *is* a difference!)
> 

Yes, I know. But gcc 4.x will complain about reading through a null 
pointer if I use 0.

I'm attaching a new patch with the modifications you suggested. If 
you're OK with that, only this small issue remains. :)

Regards,

-- 
Carlos Eduardo Seo
Software Engineer
IBM Linux Technology Center