From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9068 invoked by alias); 25 Mar 2008 22:46:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 9059 invoked by uid 22791); 25 Mar 2008 22:46:13 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from igw1.br.ibm.com (HELO igw1.br.ibm.com) (32.104.18.24) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 25 Mar 2008 22:45:52 +0000 Received: from mailhub1.br.ibm.com (mailhub1 [9.18.232.109]) by igw1.br.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12A5532C280 for ; Tue, 25 Mar 2008 19:24:28 -0300 (BRST) Received: from d24av02.br.ibm.com (d24av02.br.ibm.com [9.18.232.47]) by mailhub1.br.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v8.7) with ESMTP id m2PMjmcq3620884 for ; Tue, 25 Mar 2008 19:45:48 -0300 Received: from d24av02.br.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d24av02.br.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id m2PMjmZA029602 for ; Tue, 25 Mar 2008 19:45:48 -0300 Received: from [9.18.203.133] ([9.18.203.133]) by d24av02.br.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id m2PMjmlH029597; Tue, 25 Mar 2008 19:45:48 -0300 Message-ID: <47E98097.6020704@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2008 22:46:00 -0000 From: Carlos Eduardo Seo User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080319) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ulrich Weigand CC: Andreas Schwab , GDB Patches Mailing List Subject: Re: [RFC] Add support for PPC Altivec registers in gcore References: <200803252153.m2PLrN8e028150@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <200803252153.m2PLrN8e028150@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> OpenPGP: id=8BFFA900 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-03/txt/msg00390.txt.bz2 Ulrich Weigand wrote: > > Interesting. GCC 3.4.6 accepts it; GCC 4.1.1 does indeed > reject it with: > error: array type has incomplete element type > Exactly. GCC 4.x has more strict checks and, therefore doesn't allow this declaration. Sorry for not including the error in my previous message. So, is it OK to include that header? Thanks, -- Carlos Eduardo Seo Software Engineer IBM Linux Technology Center