From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21444 invoked by alias); 25 Mar 2008 01:02:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 21423 invoked by uid 22791); 25 Mar 2008 01:02:08 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mpv4.TIS.CWRU.Edu (HELO mpv4.tis.cwru.edu) (129.22.105.34) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 25 Mar 2008 01:01:36 +0000 Received: from mpv7.TIS.CWRU.edu (mpv7.tis.cwru.edu [129.22.104.170]) by mpv4.tis.cwru.edu (MOS 3.8.6-GA) with ESMTP id CIY25429; Mon, 24 Mar 2008 21:01:33 -0400 (EDT) Received: from z4.local (h69.240.40.69.ip.alltel.net [69.40.240.69]) by mpv7.TIS.CWRU.edu (MOS 4.0.4-FCS) with ESMTP id AHL77195 (AUTH cpr); Mon, 24 Mar 2008 21:01:32 -0400 Message-ID: <47E84EEA.8000801@case.edu> Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2008 01:02:00 -0000 From: Chet Ramey Reply-To: chet.ramey@case.edu User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Macintosh/20080213) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Nick Roberts , Jan Kratochvil , gdb-patches@sourceware.org CC: Chet Ramey Subject: Re: [patch] Fix testsuite annotate-quit race (PR 544) References: <20080318231738.GA22432@caradoc.them.org> <20080319081056.GA32510@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> <20080321204506.GA5033@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> <20080321210323.GA30247@caradoc.them.org> <20080321214448.GB29593@caradoc.them.org> <18406.14411.437345.335844@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <20080323163027.GB13603@caradoc.them.org> <20080323164331.GA1195@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> <20080323173015.GA17514@caradoc.them.org> <18406.61574.596374.828002@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <20080324025836.GA14474@caradoc.them.org> In-Reply-To: <20080324025836.GA14474@caradoc.them.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Junkmail-Status: score=10/49, host=mpv4.tis.cwru.edu X-Junkmail-SD-Raw: score=unknown, refid=str=0001.0A010205.47E84EED.0094,ss=1,fgs=0, ip=69.40.240.69, so=2007-10-30 19:00:17, dmn=5.4.3/2008-02-01 X-Junkmail-IWF: false Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-03/txt/msg00374.txt.bz2 Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > What I think is happening is that rl_redisplay has some optimizations > which cause it not to redisplay. And since we have a custom function > installed readline isn't calling the alternate hooks that force > display. So rl_redisplay does not actually meet the interface > associated with rl_redisplay_function despite being its default > value. Nasty. That's interesting, if true. Can anyone add detail confirming this? Chet -- ``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer Live Strong. No day but today. Chet Ramey, ITS, CWRU chet@case.edu http://cnswww.cns.cwru.edu/~chet/