From: Markus Deuling <deuling@de.ibm.com>
To: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, uweigand@de.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [rfc]: Use trad_frame_alloc_saved_regs in alpha-tdep
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 15:47:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47BC4B0F.6090309@de.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200802192117.m1JLHqrE011372@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1473 bytes --]
Mark Kettenis schrieb:
>> Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 21:00:36 +0100
>> From: Markus Deuling <deuling@de.ibm.com>
>>
>> Hi Mark,
>>
>> thank you very much for your effort. Maybe you can provide me your
>> gdb.log file from this testrun?
>
> I can do better than that. I've figured out what the problem is ;)
>
> Looks like you removed just a little too much target-specific code
> here. If you keep 'return_reg', things seem to work fine. I think
> the problem is that the PC generally lives in the RA register in the
> current frame (so you have to unwind it from the next frame), but that
> you were looking it up in next frame instead. See the diff below.
>
> I also changed it to use trad_frame_addr_p() where appropriate.
>
> This diff, together with your Makefile.in changes and ChangeLog is ok
> with me.
Hi Mark,
this is great ! Thank you very much ;-) I now committed the attached patch.
ChangeLog:
2008-02-20 Markus Deuling <deuling@de.ibm.com>
Mark Kettenis <kettenis@gnu.org>
* alpha-tdep.c (alpha_heuristic_unwind_cache): Replace saved_regs by
trad_frame_saved_reg.
(trad-frame.h): New include.
(alpha_heuristic_frame_unwind_cache): Use trad_frame_alloc_saved_regs
instead of frame_obstack_zalloc.
(alpha_heuristic_frame_prev_register): Use trad_frame_get_prev_register.
* Makefile.in (alpha-tdep.o): Add dependency to trad_frame_h.
Regards,
Markus
--
Markus Deuling
GNU Toolchain for Linux on Cell BE
deuling@de.ibm.com
[-- Attachment #2: diff-alpha-neu --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 5014 bytes --]
diff -urpN src/gdb/alpha-tdep.c dev/gdb/alpha-tdep.c
--- src/gdb/alpha-tdep.c 2008-01-11 15:42:52.000000000 +0100
+++ dev/gdb/alpha-tdep.c 2008-02-20 15:50:57.000000000 +0100
@@ -40,6 +40,7 @@
#include "osabi.h"
#include "block.h"
#include "infcall.h"
+#include "trad-frame.h"
#include "elf-bfd.h"
@@ -900,16 +901,6 @@ alpha_sigtramp_frame_sniffer (struct fra
return NULL;
}
\f
-/* Fallback alpha frame unwinder. Uses instruction scanning and knows
- something about the traditional layout of alpha stack frames. */
-
-struct alpha_heuristic_unwind_cache
-{
- CORE_ADDR *saved_regs;
- CORE_ADDR vfp;
- CORE_ADDR start_pc;
- int return_reg;
-};
/* Heuristic_proc_start may hunt through the text section for a long
time across a 2400 baud serial line. Allows the user to limit this
@@ -996,6 +987,17 @@ Otherwise, you told GDB there was a func
return 0;
}
+/* Fallback alpha frame unwinder. Uses instruction scanning and knows
+ something about the traditional layout of alpha stack frames. */
+
+struct alpha_heuristic_unwind_cache
+{
+ CORE_ADDR vfp;
+ CORE_ADDR start_pc;
+ struct trad_frame_saved_reg *saved_regs;
+ int return_reg;
+};
+
static struct alpha_heuristic_unwind_cache *
alpha_heuristic_frame_unwind_cache (struct frame_info *next_frame,
void **this_prologue_cache,
@@ -1012,7 +1014,7 @@ alpha_heuristic_frame_unwind_cache (stru
info = FRAME_OBSTACK_ZALLOC (struct alpha_heuristic_unwind_cache);
*this_prologue_cache = info;
- info->saved_regs = frame_obstack_zalloc (SIZEOF_FRAME_SAVED_REGS);
+ info->saved_regs = trad_frame_alloc_saved_regs (next_frame);
limit_pc = frame_pc_unwind (next_frame);
if (start_pc == 0)
@@ -1062,7 +1064,7 @@ alpha_heuristic_frame_unwind_cache (stru
All it says is that the function we are scanning reused
that register for some computation of its own, and is now
saving its result. */
- if (info->saved_regs[reg])
+ if (trad_frame_addr_p(info->saved_regs, reg))
continue;
if (reg == 31)
@@ -1078,7 +1080,7 @@ alpha_heuristic_frame_unwind_cache (stru
pointer or not. */
/* Hack: temporarily add one, so that the offset is non-zero
and we can tell which registers have save offsets below. */
- info->saved_regs[reg] = (word & 0xffff) + 1;
+ info->saved_regs[reg].addr = (word & 0xffff) + 1;
/* Starting with OSF/1-3.2C, the system libraries are shipped
without local symbols, but they still contain procedure
@@ -1155,8 +1157,8 @@ alpha_heuristic_frame_unwind_cache (stru
/* Convert offsets to absolute addresses. See above about adding
one to the offsets to make all detected offsets non-zero. */
for (reg = 0; reg < ALPHA_NUM_REGS; ++reg)
- if (info->saved_regs[reg])
- info->saved_regs[reg] += val - 1;
+ if (trad_frame_addr_p(info->saved_regs, reg))
+ info->saved_regs[reg].addr += val - 1;
return info;
}
@@ -1193,39 +1195,8 @@ alpha_heuristic_frame_prev_register (str
if (regnum == ALPHA_PC_REGNUM)
regnum = info->return_reg;
- /* For all registers known to be saved in the current frame,
- do the obvious and pull the value out. */
- if (info->saved_regs[regnum])
- {
- *optimizedp = 0;
- *lvalp = lval_memory;
- *addrp = info->saved_regs[regnum];
- *realnump = -1;
- if (bufferp != NULL)
- get_frame_memory (next_frame, *addrp, bufferp, ALPHA_REGISTER_SIZE);
- return;
- }
-
- /* The stack pointer of the previous frame is computed by popping
- the current stack frame. */
- if (regnum == ALPHA_SP_REGNUM)
- {
- *optimizedp = 0;
- *lvalp = not_lval;
- *addrp = 0;
- *realnump = -1;
- if (bufferp != NULL)
- store_unsigned_integer (bufferp, ALPHA_REGISTER_SIZE, info->vfp);
- return;
- }
-
- /* Otherwise assume the next frame has the same register value. */
- *optimizedp = 0;
- *lvalp = lval_register;
- *addrp = 0;
- *realnump = regnum;
- if (bufferp)
- frame_unwind_register (next_frame, *realnump, bufferp);
+ trad_frame_get_prev_register (next_frame, info->saved_regs, regnum,
+ optimizedp, lvalp, addrp, realnump, bufferp);
}
static const struct frame_unwind alpha_heuristic_frame_unwind = {
diff -urpN src/gdb/Makefile.in dev/gdb/Makefile.in
--- src/gdb/Makefile.in 2008-02-14 05:47:27.000000000 +0100
+++ dev/gdb/Makefile.in 2008-02-20 15:52:43.000000000 +0100
@@ -1847,7 +1847,7 @@ alpha-tdep.o: alpha-tdep.c $(defs_h) $(d
$(symtab_h) $(value_h) $(gdbcmd_h) $(gdbcore_h) $(dis_asm_h) \
$(symfile_h) $(objfiles_h) $(gdb_string_h) $(linespec_h) \
$(regcache_h) $(reggroups_h) $(arch_utils_h) $(osabi_h) $(block_h) \
- $(infcall_h) $(elf_bfd_h) $(alpha_tdep_h)
+ $(infcall_h) $(elf_bfd_h) $(alpha_tdep_h) $(trad_frame_h)
amd64bsd-nat.o: amd64bsd-nat.c $(defs_h) $(inferior_h) $(regcache_h) \
$(target_h) $(gdb_assert_h) $(amd64_tdep_h) $(amd64_nat_h) \
$(inf_ptrace_h)
prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-02-20 15:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-02-13 7:48 Markus Deuling
2008-02-15 21:43 ` Joel Brobecker
2008-02-15 23:22 ` Mark Kettenis
2008-02-18 14:15 ` Markus Deuling
2008-02-18 14:57 ` Mark Kettenis
2008-02-18 19:36 ` Mark Kettenis
2008-02-18 20:03 ` Markus Deuling
2008-02-19 21:18 ` Mark Kettenis
2008-02-20 15:47 ` Markus Deuling [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47BC4B0F.6090309@de.ibm.com \
--to=deuling@de.ibm.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl \
--cc=uweigand@de.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox