From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30200 invoked by alias); 28 Jan 2008 17:08:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 30134 invoked by uid 22791); 28 Jan 2008 17:08:52 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from igw1.br.ibm.com (HELO igw1.br.ibm.com) (32.104.18.24) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 28 Jan 2008 17:08:31 +0000 Received: from mailhub3.br.ibm.com (mailhub3 [9.18.232.110]) by igw1.br.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96A0C32C024 for ; Mon, 28 Jan 2008 14:46:41 -0200 (BRDT) Received: from d24av02.br.ibm.com (d24av02.br.ibm.com [9.18.232.47]) by mailhub3.br.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v8.7) with ESMTP id m0SH8Q3n4157690 for ; Mon, 28 Jan 2008 15:08:26 -0200 Received: from d24av02.br.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d24av02.br.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id m0SH8PI3006258 for ; Mon, 28 Jan 2008 15:08:26 -0200 Received: from [9.18.238.144] (cseo-laptop.br.ibm.com [9.18.238.144]) by d24av02.br.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id m0SH8Ppg006253; Mon, 28 Jan 2008 15:08:25 -0200 Message-ID: <479E0C05.4040900@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 17:19:00 -0000 From: Carlos Eduardo Seo User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071116) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mark Kettenis CC: jimb@codesourcery.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: expand-symtabs.exp References: <200801271528.m0RFSMo6032355@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <200801272128.m0RLSGCC027212@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> In-Reply-To: <200801272128.m0RLSGCC027212@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> OpenPGP: id=8BFFA900 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-01/txt/msg00645.txt.bz2 Mark Kettenis wrote: > So I assume Daniels suggestion of giving the function a real body won't defeat the purpose of the test. I guess not. IMHO, Daniel's patch is OK. -- Carlos Eduardo Seo Software Engineer IBM Linux Technology Center