From: Pedro Alves <pedro_alves@portugalmail.pt>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: --pid and --core
Date: Sat, 05 Jan 2008 17:26:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <477FBD8C.8020907@portugalmail.pt> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <uodc0v2qo.fsf@gnu.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 409 bytes --]
Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>> Thanks, but please make the appropriate changes in the manual as
>> well. It currently says:
>>
>> `-pid NUMBER'
>> `-p NUMBER'
>> Connect to process ID NUMBER, as with the `attach' command. If
>> there is no such process, GDB will attempt to open a core file
>> named NUMBER.
>
> In addition, this change also warrants a NEWS entry.
>
Like so ?
--
Pedro Alves
[-- Attachment #2: pid_core_doc.diff --]
[-- Type: text/x-diff, Size: 1789 bytes --]
2008-01-05 Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>
gdb/
* NEWS: Mention --pid and --core command line behaviour changes.
2008-01-05 Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>
gdb/doc/
* gdb.texinfo (File Options): Remove mention of the attempt to
open a core file with the -p option. Don't list -c as a valid
option to attach to a process.
---
gdb/NEWS | 7 +++++++
gdb/doc/gdb.texinfo | 3 ---
2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Index: src/gdb/NEWS
===================================================================
--- src.orig/gdb/NEWS 2008-01-05 17:22:19.000000000 +0000
+++ src/gdb/NEWS 2008-01-05 17:24:16.000000000 +0000
@@ -3,6 +3,13 @@
*** Changes since GDB 6.7
+* Change in command line behavior -- corefiles vs. process ids.
+
+ When the '-p NUMBER' or '--pid NUMBER' options are used, and
+ attaching to process NUMBER fails, GDB no longer attempts to open a
+ core file named NUMBER. Attaching to a program using the -c option
+ is no longer supported. Instead, use the '-p' or '--pid' options.
+
* New commands
set print frame-arguments (all|scalars|none)
Index: src/gdb/doc/gdb.texinfo
===================================================================
--- src.orig/gdb/doc/gdb.texinfo 2008-01-05 17:22:19.000000000 +0000
+++ src/gdb/doc/gdb.texinfo 2008-01-05 17:23:56.000000000 +0000
@@ -942,14 +942,11 @@ file.
@cindex @code{-c}
Use file @var{file} as a core dump to examine.
-@item -c @var{number}
@item -pid @var{number}
@itemx -p @var{number}
@cindex @code{--pid}
@cindex @code{-p}
Connect to process ID @var{number}, as with the @code{attach} command.
-If there is no such process, @value{GDBN} will attempt to open a core
-file named @var{number}.
@item -command @var{file}
@itemx -x @var{file}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-01-05 17:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-01-03 16:56 Pedro Alves
2008-01-04 5:03 ` Joel Brobecker
2008-01-04 12:20 ` Pedro Alves
2008-01-04 15:41 ` Joel Brobecker
2008-01-05 12:47 ` Eli Zaretskii
2008-01-05 12:46 ` Eli Zaretskii
2008-01-05 13:09 ` Eli Zaretskii
2008-01-05 17:26 ` Pedro Alves [this message]
2008-01-05 17:36 ` Eli Zaretskii
2008-01-05 21:58 ` Pedro Alves
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=477FBD8C.8020907@portugalmail.pt \
--to=pedro_alves@portugalmail.pt \
--cc=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox