From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1885 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2007 06:52:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 1876 invoked by uid 22791); 21 Dec 2007 06:52:38 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from s200aog17.obsmtp.com (HELO psmtp.com) (207.126.144.131) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 21 Dec 2007 06:52:27 +0000 Received: from source ([164.129.1.35]) (using TLSv1) by eu1sys200aob017.postini.com ([207.126.147.11]) with SMTP; Fri, 21 Dec 2007 06:52:22 UTC Received: from zeta.dmz-eu.st.com (ns2.st.com [164.129.230.9]) by beta.dmz-eu.st.com (STMicroelectronics) with ESMTP id 5A1A2DAC4; Fri, 21 Dec 2007 06:52:20 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail2.cro.st.com (mail2.cro.st.com [164.129.40.132]) by zeta.dmz-eu.st.com (STMicroelectronics) with ESMTP id 28F464BCF4; Fri, 21 Dec 2007 06:52:20 +0000 (GMT) Received: from crx595.cro.st.com (crx595.cro.st.com [164.129.44.95]) by mail2.cro.st.com (MOS 3.7.5a-GA) with ESMTP id CKC15063 (AUTH "denis pilat"); Fri, 21 Dec 2007 07:52:18 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <476B62A2.9080906@st.com> Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2007 07:38:00 -0000 From: Denis PILAT User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFA] TUI do not display current execution point References: <47691CE9.9020302@st.com> <001001c84246$ed9fb5b0$c8df2110$@u-strasbg.fr> <20071219150400.GB21477@caradoc.them.org> <47693859.6020004@st.com> In-Reply-To: <47693859.6020004@st.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-12/txt/msg00363.txt.bz2 Hi Daniel, I have a problem accessing remote cvs from my work, Could you please commit it for me ? (Accepted patch is here: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2007-12/msg00315.html) Thanks Denis Denis PILAT wrote: > You're both right, here is the new proposal: > >